Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20364339›Full record

ReviewNeurotoxicity research2010

Staging in neuropsychiatry: a heuristic model for understanding, prevention and treatment.

Patrick D McGorry

RetractedAbstract readReviewRetracted Publication
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurotoxicity research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. TheBMJ open · 2017
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Unmet needs in the management of schizophrenia.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2014
    Review
  7. Staging and neuroprogression in bipolar disorder.Current psychiatry reports · 2012
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Patrick D McGorryCentre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. pmcgorry@unimelb.edu.au

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main mental disorders which develop and persist through adult life typically emerge during the critical developmental phase of adolescence and early adulthood, and are frequently associated with considerable associated distress and functional decline. Our current diagnostic system lacks validity and therapeutic utility, particularly for the early stages of these mental disorders, when symptoms are still evolving and may have not yet stabilised sufficiently to fit familiar or traditional syndromal criteria. Furthermore, there is often difficulty in distinguishing transient developmental or normative changes from the early symptoms of persistent and disabling mental illness. These factors point to the need for reform of our current diagnostic systems. The clinical staging model seeks to define the extent of progression of a disorder at a particular point in time and aims to differentiate early, milder clinical phenomena from those that accompany illness progression and chronicity. The staging framework allows clinicians to select treatments relevant to earlier stages of an illness, and to evaluate their effectiveness in preventing progression and producing remission or return to milder or earlier stages of disorder. For staging to be a valid approach, interventions in the early stages need to shown to be not only more effective but also safer than treatments delivered later in the course of illness. Staging may also allow a more efficient integration of our rapidly expanding knowledge of the biological, social and psychological vulnerability factors involved in development of mental illness into what may ultimately resemble a clinicopathological staging model.

Indexed as

ComprehensionModels, PsychologicalAge FactorsAnimalsDisease ProgressionHumansMental DisordersNeuropsychiatryTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.