Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20364318›Full record

ReviewHeart failure reviews2010

Control of autocrine and paracrine myocardial signals: an emerging therapeutic strategy in heart failure.

Vincenzo Lionetti, Giacomo Bianchi, Fabio A Recchia, Carlo Ventura

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Heart failure reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. GPCRs in Autocrine and Paracrine Regulations.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2019
    Review
  7. A Proximal Culture Method to Study Paracrine Signaling Between Cells.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2018
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Exosomes from pediatric dilated cardiomyopathy patients modulate a pathological response in cardiomyocytes.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2017
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Prometheus's heart: what lies beneath.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vincenzo LionettiSector of Medicine, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Via G. Moruzzi, 1, 56124, Pisa, Italy. v.lionetti@sssup.it
Giacomo Bianchi
Fabio A Recchia
Carlo Ventura

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A growing body of evidence supports the hypothesis that autocrine and paracrine mechanisms, mediated by factors released by the resident cardiac cells, could play an essential role in the reparative process of the failing heart. Such signals may influence the function of cardiac stem cells via several mechanisms, among which the most extensively studied are cardiomyocyte survival and angiogenesis. Moreover, besides promoting cytoprotection and angiogenesis, paracrine factors released by resident cardiac cells may alter cardiac metabolism and extracellular matrix turnover, resulting in more favorable post-injury remodeling. It is reasonable to believe that critical intracellular signals are activated and modulated in a temporal and spatial manner exerting different effects, overall depending on the microenvironment changes present in the failing myocardium. The recent demonstration that chemically, mechanically or genetically activated cardiac cells may release peptides to protect tissue against ischemic injury provides a potential route to achieve the delivery of specific proteins produced by these cells for innovative pharmacological regenerative therapy of the heart. It is important to keep in mind that therapies currently used to treat heart failure (HF) and leading to improvement of cardiac function fail to induce tissue repair/regeneration. As a matter of facts, if specific autocrine/paracrine cell-derived factors that improve cardiac function will be identified, pharmacological-based therapy might be more easily translated into clinical benefits than cell-based therapy. This review will focus on the recent development of potential pharmacologic targets to promote and drive at molecular level the cardiac repair/regeneration in HF.

Indexed as

Autocrine CommunicationParacrine CommunicationAnimalsExtracellular MatrixHeart FailureHumansIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMyocardiumMyocytes, CardiacRegenerationSignal TransductionIntercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.