Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20363423›Full record

ArticleGastrointestinal endoscopy2010

Infection during natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a randomized, controlled study in a live porcine model.

Samuel A Giday, Xavier Dray, Priscilla Magno, Jonathan M Buscaglia, Eun Ji Shin, Vihar C Surti, Lia Assumpcao, Michael R Marohn, Dawn Ruben, Andrew Zhigalin and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Samuel A GidayDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Xavier Dray
Priscilla Magno
Jonathan M Buscaglia
Eun Ji Shin
Vihar C Surti
Lia Assumpcao
Michael R Marohn
Dawn Ruben
Andrew Zhigalin
Laurie J Pipitone
Sergey V Kantsevoy
Johns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · USMercy Medical Center · USUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrently reported natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) procedures in animals have been done in heterogeneous milieus ranging from nonsterile to sterile procedures, with mixed results, including no infection in those performed in nonsterile settings.

objectiveTo establish the potential frequency of infection during NOTES, comparing sterile to nonsterile approaches.

settingSurvival experiments on sixteen 50-kg pigs. DESIGN AND

interventionsFrom pilot data (100% infection frequency after nonsterile procedures), sample size (8 animals in each group) was calculated by using a power of 95% and an alpha risk of 0.05. The animals were randomly assigned to two groups: In the transgastric peritoneoscopy study group, liver and ovarian biopsies were performed with sterile overtubes, endoscopes, and accessories and the use of preoperative intravenous antibiotics and antiseptic gastric lavage. In the nonsterile (control) group, the same procedures were performed with nonsterile endoscopes and accessories without the use of gastric lavage and preoperative antibiotics. Complete transmural closure of the transgastric access site was made in all animals. After a 1-week survival time, all animals were killed for necropsy, which included Gram staining and peritoneal cultures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Intraperitoneal infection on necropsy.

resultsAll necropsies revealed intraperitoneal infection (abscesses, fibrinopurulent exudates, and adhesions) in the control group (frequency of infection 100%). Peritoneal bacterial culture grew various aerobic and anaerobic organisms. No gross or bacteriological evidence of infection was seen in the sterile group (frequency of infection 0%, P value = <.0002). LIMITATIONS: Animal experiments.

conclusionNonsterile conditions invariably lead to intraperitoneal infection. Aseptic techniques during NOTES can prevent intra-abdominal infection. Future studies will determine which infection prevention steps are mandatory and which can be omitted during NOTES procedures.

Indexed as

AnimalsAsepsisBiopsyFemaleLaparoscopyLiverOvaryPeritonitisSurgical Wound InfectionSwine

Identifiers

PMID20363423
OpenAlexW2030324478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.