Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20363118›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in cell biology2010

Multiple faces of the SAGA complex.

Evangelia Koutelou, Calley L Hirsch, Sharon Y R Dent

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in cell biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 153 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
153citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

153 citing papers in PubMed, 251 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Peculiarities of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Role of spt23 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae thermal tolerance.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

93 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Evangelia KoutelouDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Calley L Hirsch
Sharon Y R Dent
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Functions of Mammalian Histone ModifiersR01GM067718 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI DENT, SHARON Y. R. · 2003 to 2018
$3.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM067718NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM067718
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The SAGA complex provides a paradigm for multisubunit histone modifying complexes. Although first characterized as a histone acetyltransferase, because of the Gcn5 subunit, SAGA is now known to contain a second activity, a histone deubiquitinase, as well as subunits important for interactions with transcriptional activators and the general transcription machinery. The functions of SAGA in transcriptional activation are well-established in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Recent studies in S. pombe, Drosophila, and mammalian systems reveal that SAGA also has important roles in transcript elongation, the regulation of protein stability, and telomere maintenance. These functions are essential for normal embryo development in flies and mice, and mutations or altered expression of SAGA subunits correlate with neurological disease and aggressive cancers in humans.

Indexed as

AnimalsEmbryonic DevelopmentHistone AcetyltransferasesHumansMultiprotein ComplexesNeoplasmsTrans-ActivatorsUbiquitinationHistone AcetyltransferasesMultiprotein ComplexesTrans-Activators

Identifiers

PMID20363118
PMCPMC2900470
OpenAlexW2168747921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.