Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20362585›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular biology2010

Mechanism of U insertion RNA editing in trypanosome mitochondria: the bimodal TUTase activity of the core complex.

Gene-Errol Ringpis, Inna Aphasizheva, Xiaorong Wang, Lan Huang, Richard H Lathrop, G Wesley Hatfield, Ruslan Aphasizhev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. When you can't trust the DNA: RNA editing changes transcript sequences.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2011
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gene-Errol RingpisDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, B240 Medical Sciences I, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
Inna Aphasizheva
Xiaorong Wang
Lan Huang
Richard H Lathrop
G Wesley Hatfield
Ruslan Aphasizhev
University of California, Irvine · US

Funding

Proteomics of the Proteasome Interacting NetworksR01GM074830 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI HUANG, LAN · 2005 to 2022
$6.1M
RNA Uridylytransferases of TrypanosomesR01AI064653 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI AFASIZHEV, RUSLAN · 2005 to 2009
$1.8M
NIAID NIH HHS AI064653NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI064653NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM074830
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Expression of the trypanosomal mitochondrial genome requires the insertion and deletion of uridylyl residues at specific sites in pre-mRNAs. RET2 terminal uridylyl transferase is an integral component of the RNA editing core complex (RECC) and is responsible for the guide-RNA-dependent U insertion reaction. By analyzing RNA-interference-based knock-in Trypanosoma brucei cell lines, purified editing complex, and individual protein, we have investigated RET2's association with the RECC. In addition, the U insertion activity exhibited by RET2 as an RECC subunit was compared with characteristics of the monomeric protein. We show that interaction of RET2 with RECC is accomplished via a protein-protein contact between its middle domain and a structural subunit, MP81. The recombinant RET2 catalyzes a faithful editing on gapped (precleaved) double-stranded RNA substrates, and this reaction requires an internal monophosphate group at the 5' end of the mRNA 3' cleavage fragment. However, RET2 processivity is limited to insertion of three Us. Incorporation into the RECC voids the internal phosphate requirement and allows filling of longer gaps similar to those observed in vivo. Remarkably, monomeric and RECC-embedded enzymes display a similar bimodal activity: the distributive insertion of a single uracil is followed by a processive extension limited by the number of guiding nucleotides. Based on the RNA substrate specificity of RET2 and the purine-rich nature of U insertion sites, we propose that the distributive +1 insertion creates a substrate for the processive gap-filling reaction. Upon base-pairing of the +1 extended 5' cleavage fragment with a guiding nucleotide, this substrate is recognized by RET2 in a different mode compared to the product of the initial nucleolytic cleavage. Therefore, RET2 distinguishes base pairs in gapped RNA substrates which may constitute an additional checkpoint contributing to overall fidelity of the editing process.

Indexed as

Genome, MitochondrialRNA EditingMitochondriaProtozoan ProteinsRNA, Guide, KinetoplastidaRNA, MessengerRNA NucleotidyltransferasesRNA, ProtozoanTrypanosoma brucei bruceiProtozoan ProteinsRNA, Guide, KinetoplastidaRNA, MessengerRNA NucleotidyltransferasesRNA, ProtozoanUTP-RNA uridylyltransferase

Identifiers

PMID20362585
PMCPMC2885523
OpenAlexW2080348578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.