ArticleBiomaterials2010
Cell contraction forces in scaffolds with varying pore size and cell density.
Article in Biomaterials, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced Mechanical Testing Technologies at the Cellular Level: The Mechanisms and Application in Tissue Engineering.Polymers · 2023Review
- Hierarchical porous ECM scaffolds incorporating GDF-5 fabricated by cryogenic 3D printing to promote articular cartilage regeneration.Biomaterials research · 2023Article
- A type IV Autotaxin inhibitor ameliorates acute liver injury and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.EMBO molecular medicine · 2022Article
- Possible Treatment of Myocardial Infarct Based on Tissue Engineering Using a Cellularized Solid Collagen Scaffold Functionalized with Arg-Glyc-Asp (RGD) Peptide.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- The effect of collagen hydrogels on chondrocyte behaviors through restricting the contraction of cell/hydrogel constructs.Regenerative biomaterials · 2021Article
- Best of Both Hydrogel Worlds: Harnessing Bioactivity and Tunability by Incorporating Glycosaminoglycans in Collagen Hydrogels.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- 3D Superparamagnetic Scaffolds for Bone Mineralization under Static Magnetic Field Stimulation.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Article
- Investigating the interplay between substrate stiffness and ligand chemistry in directing mesenchymal stem cell differentiation within 3D macro-porous substrates.Biomaterials · 2018Article
- Acellular Urethra Bioscaffold: Decellularization of Whole Urethras for Tissue Engineering Applications.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Methodologies in creating skin substitutes.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2016Review
- Integrating Concepts of Material Mechanics, Ligand Chemistry, Dimensionality and Degradation to Control Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells.Current opinion in solid state & materials science · 2016Article
- Fabrication of anatomically-shaped cartilage constructs using decellularized cartilage-derived matrix scaffolds.Biomaterials · 2016Article
- Gradual conversion of cellular stress patterns into pre-stressed matrix architecture during in vitro tissue growth.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2016Article
- 3D Printing of Scaffolds for Tissue Regeneration Applications.Advanced healthcare materials · 2015Review
- Multiscale mechanical simulations of cell compacted collagen gels.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2013Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The contractile behavior of cells is relevant in understanding wound healing and scar formation. In tissue engineering, inhibition of the cell contractile response is critical for the regeneration of physiologically normal tissue rather than scar tissue. Previous studies have measured the contractile response of cells in a variety of conditions (e.g. on two-dimensional solid substrates, on free-floating tissue engineering scaffolds and on scaffolds under some constraint in a cell force monitor). Tissue engineering scaffolds behave mechanically like open-cell elastomeric foams: between strains of about 10 and 90%, cells progressively buckle struts in the scaffold. The contractile force required for an individual cell to buckle a strut within a scaffold has been estimated based on the strut dimensions (radius, r, and length, l) and the strut modulus, E(s). Since the buckling force varies, according to Euler's law, with r(4)/l(2), and the relative density of the scaffold varies as (r/l)(2), the cell contractile force associated with strut buckling is expected to vary with the square of the pore size for scaffolds of constant relative density. As the cell density increases, the force per cell to achieve a given strain in the scaffold is expected to decrease. Here we model the contractile response of fibroblasts by analyzing the response of a single tetrakaidecahedron to forces applied to individual struts (simulating cell contractile forces) using finite element analysis. We model tetrakaidecahedra of different strut lengths, corresponding to different scaffold pore sizes, and of varying numbers of loaded struts, corresponding to varying cell densities. We compare our numerical model with the results of free-floating contraction experiments of normal human dermal fibroblasts (NHDF) in collagen-GAG scaffolds of varying pore size and with varying cell densities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.