Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20360276›Full record

ArticlePsychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)2010

Stigma and depression treatment utilization among Latinos: utility of four stigma measures.

Alejandro Interian, Alfonso Ang, Michael A Gara, Bruce G Link, Michael A Rodriguez, William A Vega

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Engaging Latina cancer survivors, their caregivers, and community partners in a randomized controlled trial: Nueva Vida intervention.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2015
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Facilitators and barriers to Latino/a adolescents' help-seeking behaviors: Discussing mental health needs with parents and engaging in mental health services.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Frontiers in psychology · 2026
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alejandro InterianDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 671 Hoes Ln., D306, Piscataway, NJ 08854-5635, USA. interial@umdnj.edu
Alfonso Ang
Michael A Gara
Bruce G Link
Michael A Rodriguez
William A Vega

Funding

Antidepressant Adherence Among HispanicsK23MH074860 · NIMH · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI INTERIAN, ALEJANDRO · 2005 to 2009
$823k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH074860NIMH NIH HHS K23-MH074860
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesStigma associated with mental illness is an important yet understudied issue among Latinos. This study examined the psychometric properties of four stigma measures with a sample of Spanish-speaking Latino primary care patients. The study evaluated the scale for Perceived Discrimination Devaluation (PDD), the Stigma Concerns About Mental Health Care (SCMHC) scale, the Latino Scale for Antidepressant Stigma (LSAS), and the Social Distance (SD) scale.

methodsParticipants (N=200) were low-income Latinos who were screened for depression with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2) and asked about their depression treatment history, and they completed the four stigma measures at two time points (25 and 30 months from baseline). The four stigma measures were examined for internal consistency, convergent validity, construct validity, and criterion-related validity.

resultsThe factor-analytic results generally provided support for the construct validity of the measures. The four stigma measures also demonstrated internal consistency between two time points. Patients who reported greater social distance from individuals with depression were more likely to have been receiving treatment for emotional care in the past three months (odds ratio [OR]=.70, p<.05). Also, Latinos who scored high on the SCMHC (OR=.64, p<.05) and LSAS (OR=.77, p<.05) were less likely to have been taking antidepressant medications.

conclusionsThe SCMHC, LSAS, and SD scales received support for their reliability and construct validity. Results also showed some support for their criterion-related validity. A more mixed picture emerged for the PDD. Stigma ratings were associated with depression treatment utilization. Stigma ratings changed over time and were associated with treatment experiences.

Indexed as

PrejudiceSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentAdultAgedAntidepressive AgentsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHispanic or LatinoHumansLos AngelesMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMental Health ServicesMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareAntidepressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID20360276
PMCPMC3222155
OpenAlexW2096423872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.