SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2010
Effects of treatment in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
97 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 353 citations in OpenAlex.
- Relationship Between Improvements in Glycemic Control and Risk of Pregnancy Complications in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: Metaregression Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Intensive Glucose Management.Journal of diabetes research · 2025Pooled it
- Diabetes and anti-diabetic interventions and the risk of gynaecological and obstetric morbidity: an umbrella review of the literature.BMC medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Effectiveness of antidiabetic agents for treatment of gestational diabetes: A methodological quality assessment of meta-analyses and network meta-analysis.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2021Pooled it
- Treatments for women with gestational diabetes mellitus: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Different types of dietary advice for women with gestational diabetes mellitus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Hyperglycaemia and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2016 · on this mapPooled it
- Interventions for pregnant women with hyperglycaemia not meeting gestational diabetes and type 2 diabetes diagnostic criteria.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Effect of screening and management of diabetes during pregnancy on stillbirths.BMC public health · 2011Pooled it
- Physical activity before and during pregnancy and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis.Diabetes care · 2011Pooled it
- Oral microbiome modulation mitigates hyperglycemia exacerbation in gestational diabetes mellitus.Nature communications · 2026Trial
- Comparison of universal screening for gestational diabetes mellitus between one-step and two-step method among Thai pregnant women: A randomized control trial.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Primary prevention of gestational diabetes mellitus and large-for-gestational-age newborns by lifestyle counseling: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.PLoS medicine · 2011Trial
- Birth Parameters, Neonatal and Obstetric Outcomes of Mothers With Gestational Diabetes Treated With Diet and Insulin: A Retrospective Study.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2026Article
- Reactive Hypoglycaemia at Glucose Tolerance Test-Another Presentation of Gestational Diabetes: A Multicentre Retrospective Study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2025Observational
- Prevalence and predictive risk factors of hypertensive disorders in pregnant women at high risk for gestational diabetes. The PREeclampsia in DIabetiC gestaTION (PREDICTION) study.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2025Article
- Machine learning approaches for predicting fetal macrosomia at different stages of pregnancy: a retrospective study in China.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo summarise the benefits and harms of treatments for women with gestational diabetes mellitus.
designSystematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. DATA SOURCES: Embase, Medline, AMED, BIOSIS, CCMed, CDMS, CDSR, CENTRAL, CINAHL, DARE, HTA, NHS EED, Heclinet, SciSearch, several publishers' databases, and reference lists of relevant secondary literature up to October 2009. Review methods Included studies were randomised controlled trials of specific treatment for gestational diabetes compared with usual care or "intensified" compared with "less intensified" specific treatment.
resultsFive randomised controlled trials matched the inclusion criteria for specific versus usual treatment. All studies used a two step approach with a 50 g glucose challenge test or screening for risk factors, or both, and a subsequent 75 g or 100 g oral glucose tolerance test. Meta-analyses did not show significant differences for most single end points judged to be of direct clinical importance. In women specifically treated for gestational diabetes, shoulder dystocia was significantly less common (odds ratio 0.40, 95% confidence interval 0.21 to 0.75), and one randomised controlled trial reported a significant reduction of pre-eclampsia (2.5 v 5.5%, P=0.02). For the surrogate end point of large for gestational age infants, the odds ratio was 0.48 (0.38 to 0.62). In the 13 randomised controlled trials of different intensities of specific treatments, meta-analysis showed a significant reduction of shoulder dystocia in women with more intensive treatment (0.31, 0.14 to 0.70).
conclusionsTreatment for gestational diabetes, consisting of treatment to lower blood glucose concentration alone or with special obstetric care, seems to lower the risk for some perinatal complications. Decisions regarding treatment should take into account that the evidence of benefit is derived from trials for which women were selected with a two step strategy (glucose challenge test/screening for risk factors and oral glucose tolerance test).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.