Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20360047›Full record

ReviewNucleic acids research2010

Non-canonical DNA transcription enzymes and the conservation of two-barrel RNA polymerases.

Gwenaël Ruprich-Robert, Pierre Thuriaux

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nucleic acids research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Structural and Molecular Kinetic Features of Activities of DNA Polymerases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Open biology · 2020
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Gene flow and biological conflict systems in the origin and evolution of eukaryotes.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2012
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gwenaël Ruprich-RobertCEA, iBiTec-S, Service de Biologie Intégrative et Génétique Moléculaire, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Pierre Thuriaux
Institut de Biologie et Technologies · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA transcription depends on multimeric RNA polymerases that are exceptionally conserved in all cellular organisms, with an active site region of >500 amino acids mainly harboured by their Rpb1 and Rpb2 subunits. Together with the distantly related eukaryotic RNA-dependent polymerases involved in gene silencing, they form a monophyletic family of ribonucleotide polymerases with a similarly organized active site region based on two double-Psi barrels. Recent viral and phage genome sequencing have added a surprising variety of putative nucleotide polymerases to this protein family. These proteins have highly divergent subunit composition and amino acid sequences, but always contain eight invariant amino acids forming a universally conserved catalytic site shared by all members of the two-barrel protein family. Moreover, the highly conserved 'funnel' and 'switch 2' components of the active site region are shared by all putative DNA-dependent RNA polymerases and may thus determine their capacity to transcribe double-stranded DNA templates.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceBacterial ProteinsBacteriophagesCatalytic DomainConserved SequenceDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesInsect VirusesTranscription, GeneticViral ProteinsYeastsBacterial ProteinsDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20360047
PMCPMC2919709
OpenAlexW2076561604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.