Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20359597›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Cardiology2010

Common functional genetic variants in catecholamine storage vesicle protein promoter motifs interact to trigger systemic hypertension.

Kuixing Zhang, Fangwen Rao, Lei Wang, Brinda K Rana, Sajalendu Ghosh, Manjula Mahata, Rany M Salem, Juan L Rodriguez-Flores, Maple M Fung, Jill Waalen and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kuixing ZhangDepartment of Medicine, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Fangwen Rao
Lei Wang
Brinda K Rana
Sajalendu Ghosh
Manjula Mahata
Rany M Salem
Juan L Rodriguez-Flores
Maple M Fung
Jill Waalen
Bamidele Tayo
Laurent Taupenot
Sushil K Mahata
Daniel T O'Connor
University of California San Diego · USLoyola University Chicago · USScripps Research Institute · US

Funding

ZOVIRAX CREAM TO TREAT HERPES LABIALIS IN ADOLESCENTSM01RR000827 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CHANG, R JEFFREY · 1985 to 2010
$74.3M
Trafficking of catecholamine storage vesicle proteinsP01HL058120 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ZIEGLER, MICHAEL G. · 1999 to 2009
$18.5M
San Diego EXPORT Comprehensive NCMHD Research CenterP60MD000220 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DALEY, SANDRA P · 2002 to 2011
$11.0M
GENETICS OF HYPERTENSION IN BLACKSR01HL053353 · NHLBI · LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO · PI COOPER, RICHARD STANLEY · 1995 to 2013
$8.3M
NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000827NCRR NIH HHS RR00827NHLBI NIH HHS HL58120NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL058120NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL053353NIMHD NIH HHS MD000220NIMHD NIH HHS P60 MD000220
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe purpose of this study is to understand whether naturally occurring genetic variation in the promoter of chromogranin B (CHGB), a major constituent of catecholamine storage vesicles, is functional and confers risk for cardiovascular disease.

backgroundCHGB plays a necessary (catalytic) role in catecholamine storage vesicle biogenesis. Previously, we found that genetic variation at CHGB influenced autonomic function, with association maximal toward the 5' region.

methodsHere we explored transcriptional mechanisms of such effects, characterizing 2 common variants in the proximal promoter, A-296C and A-261T, using transfection/cotransfection, electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA), and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP). We then tested the effects of promoter variation on cardiovascular traits.

resultsThe A-296C disrupted a c-FOS motif, exhibiting differential mobility shifting to chromaffin cell nuclear proteins during EMSA, binding of endogenous c-FOS on ChIP, and differential response to exogenous c-FOS. The A-261T disrupted motifs for SRY and YY1, with similar consequences for EMSA, endogenous factor binding, and responses to exogenous factors. The 2-SNP CHGB promoter haplotypes had a profound (p=3.16E-20) effect on blood pressure (BP) in the European ancestry population, with a rank order of CT<AA<<CA<AT on both systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), accounting for approximately 2.3% to approximately 3.4% of SBP/DBP variance; the haplotype effects on BP in vivo paralleled those on promoter activity in cella. Site-by-site interactions at A-296C and A-261T yielded highly nonadditive effects on SBP/DBP. The CHGB haplotype effects on BP were also noted in an independent (African ancestry) sample. In normotensive twins, parallel effects were noted for a pre-hypertensive phenotype, BP response to environmental stress.

conclusionsThe common CHGB promoter variants A-296C and A-261T, and their consequent haplotypes, alter binding of specific transcription factors to influence gene expression in cella as well as BP in vivo. Such variation contributes substantially to risk for human hypertension. Involvement of the sex-specific factor SRY suggests a novel mechanism for development of sexual dimorphism in BP.

Indexed as

AdultChromogranin BFemaleGene Expression RegulationHumansHypertensionMalePromoter Regions, GeneticRisk FactorsCHGB protein, humanChromogranin B

Identifiers

PMID20359597
PMCPMC2889490
OpenAlexW2091544039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.