Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20359542›Full record

ReviewSeminars in cell & developmental biology2010

Regulation of macroautophagy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Yuko Inoue, Daniel J Klionsky

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in cell & developmental biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Proteomic Analysis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Redox Balance Keepers and Possible Cell Functions Managed by Redox Homeostasis inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuko InoueLife Sciences Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2216, USA.
Daniel J Klionsky
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

ALTERNATIVE VACUOLAR TARGETING MECHANISMS IN YEASTR01GM053396 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KLIONSKY, DANIEL J. · 1995 to 2018
$12.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM053396
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macroautophagy (hereafter autophagy) is a cellular degradation process, which in yeast is induced in response to nutrient deprivation. In this process, a double-membrane vesicle, an autophagosome, surrounds part of the cytoplasm and fuses with the vacuole to allow the breakdown and subsequent recycling of the cargo. In yeast, many autophagy-related (ATG) genes have been identified that are required for selective and/or nonselective autophagy. In all autophagy-related pathways, core Atg proteins are required for the formation of the autophagosome, which is one of the most unique aspects of autophagy and is unlike other vesicle transport events. In contrast to nonselective autophagy, the selective processes are induced in response to various specific physiological conditions such as alterations in the carbon source. In this review, we provide an overview of the common aspects concerning the mechanism of autophagy-related pathways, and highlight recent advances in our understanding of the machinery that controls autophagy induction in response to nutrient starvation conditions.

Indexed as

AutophagyPhagosomesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSignal TransductionSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20359542
PMCPMC2930024
OpenAlexW2072910780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.