Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20359332›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2010

Gene duplication and fragmentation in the zebra finch major histocompatibility complex.

Christopher N Balakrishnan, Robert Ekblom, Martin Völker, Helena Westerdahl, Ricardo Godinez, Holly Kotkiewicz, David W Burt, Tina Graves, Darren K Griffin, Wesley C Warren and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed
21.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 135 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Christopher N BalakrishnanDepartment of Organismic & Evolutionary Biology, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. cbala@igb.uiuc.edu
Robert Ekblom
Martin Völker
Helena Westerdahl
Ricardo Godinez
Holly Kotkiewicz
David W Burt
Tina Graves
Darren K Griffin
Wesley C Warren
Scott V Edwards
Washington University in St. Louis · USHarvard University · USUniversity of Kent · GBLund University · SEUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Sensory Neuroscience Training ProgramT32DC006612 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI FENG, ALBERT S · 2004 to 2008
$1.2M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E010652/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E024211/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/05191130NIDCD NIH HHS T32DC006612
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to its high polymorphism and importance for disease resistance, the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) has been an important focus of many vertebrate genome projects. Avian MHC organization is of particular interest because the chicken Gallus gallus, the avian species with the best characterized MHC, possesses a highly streamlined minimal essential MHC, which is linked to resistance against specific pathogens. It remains unclear the extent to which this organization describes the situation in other birds and whether it represents a derived or ancestral condition. The sequencing of the zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata genome, in combination with targeted bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) sequencing, has allowed us to characterize an MHC from a highly divergent and diverse avian lineage, the passerines.

resultsThe zebra finch MHC exhibits a complex structure and history involving gene duplication and fragmentation. The zebra finch MHC includes multiple Class I and Class II genes, some of which appear to be pseudogenes, and spans a much more extensive genomic region than the chicken MHC, as evidenced by the presence of MHC genes on each of seven BACs spanning 739 kb. Cytogenetic (FISH) evidence and the genome assembly itself place core MHC genes on as many as four chromosomes with TAP and Class I genes mapping to different chromosomes. MHC Class II regions are further characterized by high endogenous retroviral content. Lastly, we find strong evidence of selection acting on sites within passerine MHC Class I and Class II genes.

conclusionThe zebra finch MHC differs markedly from that of the chicken, the only other bird species with a complete genome sequence. The apparent lack of synteny between TAP and the expressed MHC Class I locus is in fact reminiscent of a pattern seen in some mammalian lineages and may represent convergent evolution. Our analyses of the zebra finch MHC suggest a complex history involving chromosomal fission, gene duplication and translocation in the history of the MHC in birds, and highlight striking differences in MHC structure and organization among avian lineages.

Indexed as

DNA FragmentationGene DuplicationAnimalsBase SequenceBlotting, SouthernChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialFinchesGenomeGenomicsIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceLikelihood FunctionsMajor Histocompatibility ComplexModels, GeneticMolecular Sequence DataPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID20359332
PMCPMC2907588
OpenAlexW1975429221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.