ReviewDer Orthopade2010
[Stabilization of the osteoporotic spine from a biomechanical viewpoint].
Review in Der Orthopade, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Osteoporotic vertebral body fractures].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- Functionalization of screw implants with superelastic structured Nitinol anchoring elements.Biomedical engineering online · 2022Article
- Differentiation of Traumatic Osteoporotic and Non-Osteoporotic Vertebral AO A3 Fractures by Analyzing the Posterior Edge Morphology-A Retrospective Feasibility Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- [Hounsfield units as a measure of bone density-applications in spine surgery].Der Unfallchirurg · 2019Article
- Osteoporotic vertebral body fractures of the thoracolumbar spine: indications and techniques of a 360°-stabilization.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2017Review
- [Percutaneous stabilization of thoracolumbar fractures. Techniques of fracture reduction and spinal cord decompression].Der Unfallchirurg · 2013Article
- [Osteoporotic vertebral body fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. Diagnostics and therapeutic strategies].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The altered trabecular structure of the osteoporotic spine leads to an increased vulnerability of its biomechanical characteristics and reduction of load resistance. Therefore, any surgical procedure must account for these circumstances. In cement-augmented vertebrae, both the overall stability and load transfer to the adjacent structures are influenced by a variety of factors. This has been demonstrated by different findings regarding volume, special characteristics, choice of approach and application, as well as distribution of the cement within the vertebral body. Independent of the well-known good clinical results, these features leave the discussion regarding the most appropriate form of cement-augmenting technique open. In cases where implants are required, there are increasing data to allow for an appropriate choice of stabilizing devices to fit the biomechanical demands in poor bone quality. Thereby, multilevel instrumentation, additive stabilization techniques, cement-augmented pedicle screws and adapted implant designs ensure and increase patient safety. However, regardless of the procedure chosen to stabilize the osteoporotic spine, reconstruction of the column profile appears to be of pre-eminent importance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20358324What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.