Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20357195›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2010

Detection of cystoid macular edema with three-dimensional optical coherence tomography versus fluorescein angiography.

Yanling Ouyang, Pearse A Keane, Srinivas R Sadda, Alexander C Walsh

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Are optical coherence tomography and fluorescein angiography comparable for detection of macular edema in Behçet uveitis?Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Retinal vessel diameter measurements by spectral domain optical coherence tomography.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2015
    Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yanling OuyangDoheny Eye Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Pearse A Keane
Srinivas R Sadda
Alexander C Walsh
Doheny Eye Institute · US

Funding

Optics Instrumentation for Advanced Ophthalmic ImagingR01EY014375 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI WILLIAMS, DAVID R · 2003 to 2012
$14.9M
VISION RESEARCHP30EY003040 · NEI · DOHENY EYE INSTITUTE · PI SUN, DEMING · 1985 to 2013
$7.0M
NEI NIH HHS EY03040NEI NIH HHS P30 EY003040NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014375
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the sensitivity and reproducibility of three-dimensional optical coherence tomography (3D-OCT) and fluorescein angiography (FA) for the detection of cystoid macular edema (CME).

methodsData were retrospectively collected from all patients who underwent digital FA and 512 × 128 horizontal raster 3D-OCT scans on the same day in a retina subspecialty clinic. Images were reviewed independently by four reading center graders and adjudicated as a group to render a single result for each eye and each imaging modality. The κ statistic was used to determine the level of agreement between graders for each modality. The sensitivity of each imaging modality for CME detection was calculated by using the presence of CME on either modality as the ground truth; subgroup analysis was performed according to disease diagnosis and lens status.

resultsFour hundred thirteen eyes of 207 patients were included in the analysis. Intergrader agreement was higher for 3D-OCT than for FA both before (κ(OCT) = 0.61, κ(FA) = 0.43) and after adjudication (κ(OCT) = 0.74, κ(FA) = 0.58).The sensitivity for detection of definite CME was higher for 3D-OCT (95%, 144/151 cases) than for FA (44%, 67/151 cases). Definite FA (+) 3D-OCT (-) CME was identified in 1 eye (0.2%), whereas definite FA (-) 3D-OCT (+) CME was identified in 40 eyes (10%). No significant associations between CME detection and lens examination or disease diagnosis were observed.

conclusionsIn this study, 3D-OCT was more sensitive and had better intergrader agreement than did FA for the detection of CME.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFalse Negative ReactionsFemaleFluorescein AngiographyHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMacular EdemaMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID20357195
PMCPMC3066608
OpenAlexW2059688525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.