Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20357062›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2010

Discrimination of communication vocalizations by single neurons and groups of neurons in the auditory midbrain.

David M Schneider, Sarah M N Woolley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. GABAJournal of neurophysiology · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. A Hierarchy of Time Scales for Discriminating and Classifying the Temporal Shape of Sound in Three Auditory Cortical Fields.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A Decline in Response Variability Improves Neural Signal Detection during Auditory Task Performance.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  13. Behavioral and Single-Neuron Sensitivity to Millisecond Variations in Temporally Patterned Communication Signals.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David M SchneiderDepartment of Psychology, Columbia University, 406 Schermerhorn Hall, 1190 Amsterdam Ave, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Sarah M N Woolley
Columbia University · US

Funding

NEUROBIOLOGY AND BEHAVIOR RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMT32HD007430 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GRUEBER, WESLEY B · 1999 to 2017
$6.8M
Neural Coding and Perception of Learned VocalizationsR01DC009810 · NIDCD · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI WOOLLEY, SARAH M · 2010 to 2020
$3.5M
Discrimination of communication sounds in auditory scenesF31DC010301 · NIDCD · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI SCHNEIDER, DAVID MICHAEL · 2009 to 2012
$115k
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007430NIDCD NIH HHS F31-DC-010301NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009810
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many social animals including songbirds use communication vocalizations for individual recognition. The perception of vocalizations depends on the encoding of complex sounds by neurons in the ascending auditory system, each of which is tuned to a particular subset of acoustic features. Here, we examined how well the responses of single auditory neurons could be used to discriminate among bird songs and we compared discriminability to spectrotemporal tuning. We then used biologically realistic models of pooled neural responses to test whether the responses of groups of neurons discriminated among songs better than the responses of single neurons and whether discrimination by groups of neurons was related to spectrotemporal tuning and trial-to-trial response variability. The responses of single auditory midbrain neurons could be used to discriminate among vocalizations with a wide range of abilities, ranging from chance to 100%. The ability to discriminate among songs using single neuron responses was not correlated with spectrotemporal tuning. Pooling the responses of pairs of neurons generally led to better discrimination than the average of the two inputs and the most discriminating input. Pooling the responses of three to five single neurons continued to improve neural discrimination. The increase in discriminability was largest for groups of neurons with similar spectrotemporal tuning. Further, we found that groups of neurons with correlated spike trains achieved the largest gains in discriminability. We simulated neurons with varying levels of temporal precision and measured the discriminability of responses from single simulated neurons and groups of simulated neurons. Simulated neurons with biologically observed levels of temporal precision benefited more from pooling correlated inputs than did neurons with highly precise or imprecise spike trains. These findings suggest that pooling correlated neural responses with the levels of precision observed in the auditory midbrain increases neural discrimination of complex vocalizations.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAction PotentialsAnimalsAuditory PathwaysAuditory PerceptionComputer SimulationDiscrimination, PsychologicalEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemMaleMesencephalonModels, NeurologicalNeuronsStatistics as TopicVocalization, AnimalZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID20357062
PMCPMC2888246
OpenAlexW1966719609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.