ArticleBMC systems biology2010
Discriminating between rival biochemical network models: three approaches to optimal experiment design.
Article in BMC systems biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation-based model selection for 13C metabolic flux analysis with uncertain measurement errors.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Discriminating between negative cooperativity and ligand binding to independent sites using pre-equilibrium properties of binding curves.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Biological signal generators: integrating synthetic biology tools andCurrent opinion in systems biology · 2019Article
- Optimal parameter identification of synthetic gene networks using harmony search algorithm.PloS one · 2019Article
- CrossPlan: systematic planning of genetic crosses to validate mathematical models.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- Identification of gene regulation models from single-cell data.Physical biology · 2018Article
- A review of active learning approaches to experimental design for uncovering biological networks.PLoS computational biology · 2017Review
- Experiment Design for Early Molecular Events in HIV Infection.Proceedings of the ... American Control Conference. American Control Conference · 2017Article
- Numerical algebraic geometry for model selection and its application to the life sciences.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2016Article
- Designing Experiments to Discriminate Families of Logic Models.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2015Article
- Experimental design schemes for learning Boolean network models.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2014Article
- Combining test statistics and models in bootstrapped model rejection: it is a balancing act.BMC systems biology · 2014Article
- Optimal experiment design for model selection in biochemical networks.BMC systems biology · 2014Article
- Reverse engineering and identification in systems biology: strategies, perspectives and challenges.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2014Review
- Simultaneous model discrimination and parameter estimation in dynamic models of cellular systems.BMC systems biology · 2013Article
- Validation of a model of the GAL regulatory system via robustness analysis of its bistability characteristics.BMC systems biology · 2013Article
- Maximizing the information content of experiments in systems biology.PLoS computational biology · 2013Article
- Optimal design of stimulus experiments for robust discrimination of biochemical reaction networks.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2012Article
- Parameter-free model discrimination criterion based on steady-state coplanarity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012Article
- Using noise for model-testing.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe success of molecular systems biology hinges on the ability to use computational models to design predictive experiments, and ultimately unravel underlying biological mechanisms. A problem commonly encountered in the computational modelling of biological networks is that alternative, structurally different models of similar complexity fit a set of experimental data equally well. In this case, more than one molecular mechanism can explain available data. In order to rule out the incorrect mechanisms, one needs to invalidate incorrect models. At this point, new experiments maximizing the difference between the measured values of alternative models should be proposed and conducted. Such experiments should be optimally designed to produce data that are most likely to invalidate incorrect model structures.
resultsIn this paper we develop methodologies for the optimal design of experiments with the aim of discriminating between different mathematical models of the same biological system. The first approach determines the 'best' initial condition that maximizes the L2 (energy) distance between the outputs of the rival models. In the second approach, we maximize the L2-distance of the outputs by designing the optimal external stimulus (input) profile of unit L2-norm. Our third method uses optimized structural changes (corresponding, for example, to parameter value changes reflecting gene knock-outs) to achieve the same goal. The numerical implementation of each method is considered in an example, signal processing in starving Dictyostelium amoebae.
conclusionsModel-based design of experiments improves both the reliability and the efficiency of biochemical network model discrimination. This opens the way to model invalidation, which can be used to perfect our understanding of biochemical networks. Our general problem formulation together with the three proposed experiment design methods give the practitioner new tools for a systems biology approach to experiment design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.