Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20354911›Full record

ArticleJournal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine2010

What makes a respondent-driven sampling "seed" productive? Example of finding at-risk Massachusetts men who have sex with men.

Sari L Reisner, Matthew J Mimiaga, Carey V Johnson, Sean Bland, Patricia Case, Steven A Safren, Kenneth H Mayer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Evaluation of respondent-driven sampling in a study of urban young men who have sex with men.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sari L ReisnerThe Fenway Institute, Fenway Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Matthew J Mimiaga
Carey V Johnson
Sean Bland
Patricia Case
Steven A Safren
Kenneth H Mayer

Funding

Behavioral activation and HIV risk reduction for MSM with crystal meth abuseR03DA023393 · NIDA · FENWAY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER · PI MIMIAGA, MATTHEW JAMES · 2008 to 2009
$151k
NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA023393NIDA NIH HHS R03DA023393
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several recent studies have sought to elaborate upon the applicability and validity of respondent-driven sampling (RDS) to find hard-to-reach samples in general and men who have sex with men (MSM) in particular. Few published studies have elucidated the characteristics associated with initial RDS participants ("seeds") who successfully recruited others into a study. A total of 74 original seeds were analyzed from four Massachusetts studies conducted between 2006 and 2008 that used RDS to reach high-risk MSM. Seeds were considered "generative" if they recruited two or more subsequent participants and "non-generative" if they recruited zero or one participant. Overall, 34% of seeds were generative. In separate multivariable logistic regression models controlling for age, race, health insurance, HIV status, and the study for which the seed was enrolled, unprotected anal sex in the past 12 months [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 6.68; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.27-35.12; p = 0.03], cocaine use during sex at least monthly during the past 12 months (AOR = 8.81; 95% CI = 1.68-46.27; p = 0.01), and meeting sex partners at social gatherings (AOR = 7.42; 95% CI = 1.58-34.76; p = 0.01) and public cruising areas (AOR = 4.92; 95% CI = 1.27-19.01; p = 0.02) were each significantly associated with increased odds of being a generative seed. These findings have methodological and practical implications for the recruitment of MSM via RDS. Finding ways to identify RDS seeds that are consistently generative may facilitate collecting a sample that is closer to reflecting the MSM who live in all of the communities in a given location or study sample.

Indexed as

Homosexuality, MaleResearch DesignAdolescentAdultBostonData CollectionHIV SeropositivityHumansMaleMiddle AgedPersonnel SelectionProgram EvaluationSampling StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID20354911
PMCPMC2871093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.