Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20354767›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical research2010

Nanoparticles for local drug delivery to the oral mucosa: proof of principle studies.

Andrew S Holpuch, Garrett J Hummel, Meng Tong, Garrett A Seghi, Ping Pei, Ping Ma, Russell J Mumper, Susan R Mallery

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The Benefits of Smart Nanoparticles in Dental Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew S HolpuchDivision of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Pathology & Anesthesiology, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Garrett J Hummel
Meng Tong
Garrett A Seghi
Ping Pei
Ping Ma
Russell J Mumper
Susan R Mallery
The Ohio State University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Comprehensive Training in Oral &Craniofacial SciencesT32DE014320 · NIDCR · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SHERIDAN, JOHN F · 2001 to 2022
$10.2M
Chemoprevention of Head & Neck Cancer Using Controlled Release PolymersR01CA129609 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MALLERY, SUSAN R · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
Role of Oxidants &Angiogenesis in Kaposi's SarcomaR01CA095901 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MALLERY, SUSAN R · 2003 to 2007
$1.4M
EGFR Targeted Nanoparticles to Overcome Paclitaxel Resistant Breast CancerR01CA115197 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MUMPER, RUSSELL J · 2006 to 2009
$995k
Evaluation of bioadhesive berry gels for oral cancer chemopreventionR21CA132138 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MALLERY, SUSAN R · 2008 to 2009
$390k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA095901NCI NIH HHS R01 CA115197NCI NIH HHS R01 CA129609NCI NIH HHS R01 CA95901NCI NIH HHS R21 CA132138NIDCR NIH HHS T32 DE014320NIDCR NIH HHS T32 DE14320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine if solid lipid nanoparticles represent a viable strategy for local delivery of poorly water soluble and unstable chemopreventive compounds to human oral tissues.

methodsNanoparticle uptake and compound retention evaluations employed monolayer-cultured human oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) cell lines and normal human oral mucosal explants. Feasibility of nanoparticle delivery was also evaluated with respect to the presence of phase-III efflux transporters in normal oral mucosal tissue and OSCC tissues.

resultsFunctional uptake assays confirmed significantly greater internalization of nanoparticle-delivered fluorescent probe relative to free-fluorescent probe delivery, while concurrently demonstrating nanoparticle uptake rate differences among the OSCC cell lines and the phagocytic control human monocyte cell line. Mucosal explants exhibited nanoparticle penetration and internalization in the spinous and basal epithelial layers (7/10 specimens), and also exhibited the presence of the phase-III efflux transporters multidrug resistance-associated protein 1 (MRP1) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP).

conclusionsThese data confirm nanoparticle internalization by OSCC cells and support the premise that nanoparticle-based delivery provides higher final intracellular levels relative to bolus administration. Furthermore, the penetration and subsequent internalization of nanoparticles within the proliferating basal layer cells demonstrates the feasibility of nanoparticle formulations for local delivery and stabilization of oral chemopreventive compounds.

Indexed as

Mouth MucosaAntibiotics, AntineoplasticBlotting, WesternBoron CompoundsCarcinoma, Squamous CellCells, CulturedDrug Delivery SystemsFluorescent DyesHumansIdarubicinImmunohistochemistryNanoparticles4,4-difluoro-5,7-dimethyl-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene-3-dodecanoic acidAntibiotics, AntineoplasticBoron CompoundsFluorescent DyesIdarubicin

Identifiers

PMID20354767
PMCPMC2883929
OpenAlexW2048364135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.