Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20354765›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical research2011

Microneedle-based intradermal delivery enables rapid lymphatic uptake and distribution of protein drugs.

Alfred J Harvey, Scott A Kaestner, Diane E Sutter, Noel G Harvey, John A Mikszta, Ronald J Pettis

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Fluorescent Tracers forFrontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Development of vaccine formulations: past, present, and future.Drug delivery and translational research · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alfred J HarveyBD Technologies, 21 Davis Drive, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA.
Scott A Kaestner
Diane E Sutter
Noel G Harvey
John A Mikszta
Ronald J Pettis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this research was to examine the pharmacokinetics (PK) of drug uptake for microneedle-based intradermal (ID) delivery of several classes of protein drugs compared to standard subcutaneous (SC) administration.

methodsSystemic absorption kinetics of various proteins were analyzed following microneedle-based ID delivery and standard injection methods in the swine model. Comparative PK data were determined using standard non-compartmental techniques based on blood serum levels.

resultsDelivery of proteins using microneedles resulted in faster systemic availability, measured via t(max,) and increased maximal drug concentration, C(max,) over SC delivery for all proteins tested. Some agents also exhibited increased bioavailability for the ID route. Imaging studies using reporter dyes showed rapid lymphatic-mediated uptake.

conclusionsMicroneedle delivery is applicable to a wide variety of protein drugs and is capable of effective parenteral administration of therapeutic drug dosages. This delivery route alters absorption kinetics via targeting a tissue bed better perfused with lymphatic and blood vessels than the SC space. Microneedle delivery may afford various advantages, including a robust method to increase the absorption rate and bioavailability of proteins that have been challenging to deliver at therapeutic levels or with physiologically relevant profiles.

Indexed as

NeedlesAnimalsDrug Delivery SystemsEquipment DesignEtanerceptFemaleHuman Growth HormoneImmunoglobulin GInjections, IntradermalInsulinLymph NodesMicroinjectionsReceptors, Tumor Necrosis FactorRecombinant ProteinsSkinSwineEtanerceptHuman Growth HormoneImmunoglobulin GInsulinReceptors, Tumor Necrosis FactorRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.