Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20354127›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2010

Tobacco smoke exposure in nonsmoking hospitality workers before and after a state smoking ban.

Joni A Jensen, Barbara A Schillo, Molly M Moilanen, Bruce R Lindgren, Sharon Murphy, Steven Carmella, Stephen S Hecht, Dorothy K Hatsukami

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Metabolites of a tobacco-specific lung carcinogen in children exposed to secondhand or thirdhand tobacco smoke in their homes.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2011
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Relationships Between Smoking Behaviors and Cotinine Levels Among Two American Indian Populations With Distinct Smoking Patterns.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Biomarkers of Tobacco Exposure: Summary of an FDA-Sponsored Public Workshop.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The ratio of a urinary tobacco-specific lung carcinogen metabolite to cotinine is significantly higher in passive than in active smokers.Biomarkers : biochemical indicators of exposure, response, and susceptibility to chemicals · 2011
    Article
  16. Recent contributions of air- and biomarkers to the control of secondhand smoke (SHS): a review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2011
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joni A JensenTobacco Use Research Center, University of Minnesota, 717 Delaware Street South East, Minneapolis, MN 55414, USA.
Barbara A Schillo
Molly M Moilanen
Bruce R Lindgren
Sharon Murphy
Steven Carmella
Stephen S Hecht
Dorothy K Hatsukami
University of Minnesota · USClearWay Minnesota · US

Funding

TOBACCO REDUCTION STRATEGIES FOR PATIENTS WITH CARDIAC DISEASEP50DA013333 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI HATSUKAMI, DOROTHY K · 1999 to 2008
$16.8M
NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA013333NIDA NIH HHS P50DA 013333
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Secondhand smoke exposure is estimated to account for 3,000 cancer deaths per year. Although several countries and states in the United States have passed comprehensive smoke-free laws to protect all employees, a significant number of workers are still not protected. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of passing a comprehensive smoking ban that included bars and restaurants on biomarkers of nicotine and carcinogen exposure. The urines of nonsmoking employees (n = 24) of bars and restaurants that allowed smoking before the smoke-free law were analyzed before and after the law was passed in Minnesota. The results showed significant reductions in both total cotinine and 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (free plus glucuronidated) after the ban was instituted. These results provide further support for the importance of protecting employees working in all venues.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAir Pollution, IndoorCotinineFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNitrosaminesOccupational ExposureOccupational HealthPyridinesRestaurantsTobacco Smoke PollutionWorkplaceYoung Adult4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butan-1-olCotinineNitrosaminesPyridinesTobacco Smoke Pollution

Identifiers

PMID20354127
PMCPMC2859032
OpenAlexW2118096275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.