Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20353290›Full record

ArticleFoodborne pathogens and disease2010

The effect of clinical outbreaks of salmonellosis on the prevalence of fecal Salmonella shedding among dairy cattle in New York.

Kevin J Cummings, Lorin D Warnick, Mara Elton, Yrjo T Gröhn, Patrick L McDonough, Julie D Siler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foodborne pathogens and disease, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. In Vitro Investigation of the Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Detection of a hydrogen sulfide-negativeFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Monitoring the Microevolution ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Salmonella in Dairy Cattle.The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kevin J CummingsDepartment of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA. kjc39@cornell.edu
Lorin D Warnick
Mara Elton
Yrjo T Gröhn
Patrick L McDonough
Julie D Siler

Funding

FOOD &WATERBORNE DISEASES INTEGRATED RESEARCH NETWORK, ZOONOES RESEAR-N01AI030054 · NIAID · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · 2003 to 2003
–
NIAID NIH HHS N01-AI-30054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine if the within-herd prevalence of fecal Salmonella shedding is higher in dairy herds with clinical outbreaks of disease, as compared to herds with subclinical infections only. Data were collected prospectively from dairy herds throughout New York that had at least 150 lactating cows and that received clinical service from participating veterinarians. After enrollment, Salmonella surveillance consisted of both environmental screening and disease monitoring within the herd. Herds positive by either environmental or fecal culture were sampled during three visits to estimate the within-herd prevalence of Salmonella. We characterized isolates by serovar and antimicrobial resistance pattern. Among 57 enrolled herds, 44 (77%) yielded Salmonella-positive samples during the study period; 27 (61%) of the positive herds had Salmonella isolated from environmental samples only, and 17 (39%) had one or more laboratory-confirmed clinical cases. The within-herd prevalence of fecal Salmonella shedding ranged from 0 to 53%. Salmonella Cerro was the predominant serovar, accounting for 56% of all isolates. Antimicrobial resistance ranged from zero to nine drugs, and 14 (32%) of the positive farms generated multidrug-resistant isolates. Herds with laboratory-confirmed clinical cases had a higher prevalence of fecal Salmonella shedding than herds that only generated positive environmental samples, as estimated by a Poisson regression model (prevalence ratio, 2.7; p = 0.01). An association between dairy herd outbreaks of salmonellosis and a higher prevalence of asymptomatic shedding should help guide strategies for reducing the public health threat of Salmonella, as the ability to recognize high-risk herds by clinical laboratory submissions presents an obvious opportunity to maximize food safety at the preharvest level. This is in contrast with other foodborne zoonotic pathogens, such as Campylobacter jejuni and Escherichia coli O157:H7, which occur widely in adult cattle without accompanying clinical disease.

Indexed as

Bacterial SheddingDairyingAgglutination TestsAnimalsCattleCattle DiseasesDisease OutbreaksDrug Resistance, MultipleFecesHousing, AnimalMicrobial Sensitivity TestsNew YorkPoisson DistributionPopulation SurveillancePrevalenceRectum

Identifiers

PMID20353290
PMCPMC3132070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.