Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20352481›Full record

ArticleJournal of community health2010

Disease maps as context for community mapping: a methodological approach for linking confidential health information with local geographical knowledge for community health research.

Kirsten M M Beyer, Sara Comstock, Renea Seagren

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community health, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Community engagement in the development of health-related data visualizations: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. The use and value of maps in Community-Oriented Primary Care: Does process matter?African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kirsten M M BeyerDepartment of Population Health, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA. kbeyer@mcw.edu
Sara Comstock
Renea Seagren

Funding

Improving the Health of the Rural Upper Midwest Through*U48DP000034 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI SNETSELAAR, LINDA G. · 2005 to 2008
$2.2M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS 5U48DP000034-05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health is increasingly understood as a product of multiple levels of influence, from individual biological and behavioral influences to community and societal level contextual influences. In understanding these contextual influences, community health researchers have increasingly employed both geographic methodologies, including Geographic Information Systems (GIS), and community participatory approaches. However, despite growing interest in the role for community participation and local knowledge in community health investigations, and the use of geographical methods and datasets in characterizing community environments, there exist few examples of research projects that incorporate both geographical and participatory approaches in addressing health questions. This is likely due in part to concerns and restrictions regarding community access to confidential health data. In order to overcome this barrier, we present a method for linking confidential, geocoded health information with community-generated experiential geographical information in a GIS environment. We use sophisticated disease mapping methodologies to create continuously defined maps of colorectal cancer in Iowa, then incorporate these layers in an open source GIS application as the context for a participatory community mapping exercise with participants from a rural Iowa town. Our method allows participants to interact directly with health information at a fine geographical scale, facilitating hypothesis generation regarding contextual influences on health, while simultaneously protecting data confidentiality. Participants are able to use their local, geographical knowledge to generate hypotheses about factors influencing colorectal cancer risk in the community and opportunities for risk reduction. This work opens the door for future efforts to integrate empirical epidemiological data with community generated experiential information to inform community health research and practice.

Indexed as

ConfidentialityGeographic Information SystemsCluster AnalysisColorectal NeoplasmsCommunity ParticipationFemaleHumansIowaMaleMedical InformaticsMiddle AgedRiskRural HealthTopography, Medical

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.