Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20352471›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neuro-oncology2010

Low-dose fotemustine for recurrent malignant glioma: a multicenter phase II study.

Alessandra Fabi, Giulio Metro, Antonello Vidiri, Gaetano Lanzetta, Mariantonia Carosi, Stefano Telera, Marta Maschio, Michelangelo Russillo, Isabella Sperduti, Carmine M Carapella and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alessandra FabiDivision of Medical Oncology, Regina Elena Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi, 53, Rome, Italy. alessandra.fabi@virgilio.it
Giulio Metro
Antonello Vidiri
Gaetano Lanzetta
Mariantonia Carosi
Stefano Telera
Marta Maschio
Michelangelo Russillo
Isabella Sperduti
Carmine M Carapella
Francesco Cognetti
Andrea Pace
Cancer Institute (WIA) · INNational Institute for Astrophysics · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fotemustine at the conventional dose of 100 mg/m(2) is an active treatment for recurrent malignant gliomas (RMGs). However, it is associated with a relevant incidence of severe myelotoxicity, which is not justified in the palliative setting of this disease. This study was conducted to address whether administration of fotemustine at 60 mg/m(2) (induction) followed by 75 mg/m(2) (maintenance) would preserve clinical activity with the advantage of improved tolerance. Forty patients with RMGs pretreated with ≤2 lines of chemotherapy were enrolled. Median age was 57 years (26-80) and median Karnofsky performance status was 80 (60-100). Thirty-one patients (77.5%) had tissue available for analysis of the O(6)-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter which was found to be methylated in 14 cases (45%). Overall, 8 partial responses (20%) and 13 disease stabilizations (32.5%) were observed for a disease-control rate of 52.5%. At 6 months, 21% of patients were free from progression. Grades 3 and 4 platelet and white blood cell toxicity occurred in ≤10% of patients, and no patients discontinued treatment because of toxicity. No significant difference was observed for disease control rate between methylated and unmethylated patients, although a trend toward improved progression-free survival was reported for methylated patients. Low-dose fotemustine has activity comparable with that of the full-dose regimen, therefore it should be preferred for its greater tolerability. The role of MGMT gene promoter methylation status in relation to sensitivity to fotemustine is still unclear and needs further evaluation in future clinical trials.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsBrain NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalDNA MethylationDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleGliomaHumansInfusions, IntravenousKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleAntineoplastic AgentsDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesfotemustineMGMT protein, humanNitrosourea CompoundsOrganophosphorus CompoundsTumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20352471
OpenAlexW2054370305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.