Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20352309›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2010

Considerations for the impact of personal genome information: a study of genomic profiling among genetics and genomics professionals.

Julianne M O'Daniel, Susanne B Haga, Huntington F Willard

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genetic Counseling and Genome Sequencing in Pediatric Rare Disease.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2020
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Patients' understanding of and responses to multiplex genetic susceptibility test results.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2012
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Direct-to-consumer personalized genomic testing.Human molecular genetics · 2011
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julianne M O'DanielDuke Institute for Genome Sciences & Policy, Duke University, 450 Research Drive, LSRC B342C, Box 91009, Durham, NC 27708, USA. julianne.odaniel@duke.edu
Susanne B Haga
Huntington F Willard

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the expansion of genomic-based clinical applications, it is important to consider the potential impact of this information particularly in terms of how it may be interpreted and applied to personal perceptions of health. As an initial step to exploring this question, we conducted a study to gain insight into potential psychosocial and health motivations for, as well as impact associated with, undergoing testing and disclosure of individual "variomes" (catalogue of genetic variations). To enable the collection of fully informed opinions, 14 participants with advanced training in genetics underwent whole-genome profiling and received individual reports of estimated genomic ancestry, genotype data and reported disease associations. Emotional, cognitive and health behavioral impact was assessed through one-on-one interviews and questionnaires administered pre-testing and 1-week and 3-months post-testing. Notwithstanding the educational and professional bias of our study population, the results identify several areas of research for consideration within additional populations. With the development of new and less costly approaches to genome risk profiling, now available for purchase direct-to-consumers, it is essential that genome science research be conducted in parallel with studies assessing the societal and policy implications of genome information for personal use.

Indexed as

Genetic CounselingGenetic TestingGenome, HumanPrecision MedicineAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedWorkforce

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.