Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20352203›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of membrane biology2010

Nonneuronal cholinergic system in human erythrocytes: biological role and clinical relevance.

J P Lopes de Almeida, C Saldanha

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of membrane biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

J P Lopes de AlmeidaInstituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina de Lisboa, University of Lisbon Medical School, Edifício Egas Moniz, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, 1649-028, Lisbon, Portugal. jpedro.gla@gmail.com
C Saldanha

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acetylcholine is well known in the medical setting as one of the most exemplary neurotransmitters. Its ubiquity in nature otherwise suggests a theoretically diverse spectrum of action and an extremely early appearance in the evolutionary process. In humans, acetylcholine and its synthesizing enzyme, choline acetyltransferase, have been found in various nonneural tissues such as the epithelium, mesothelium, endothelium, muscle, immune cells and blood cells. The widespread expression of nonneuronal acetylcholine is accompanied by the ubiquitous presence of acetylcholinesterase and nicotinic/muscarinic receptors. Structural and functional dissimilarities are evident between the nonneuronal and neuronal cholinergic systems. An increasing body of evidence throughout the last few years has placed acetylcholine as a major cellular signaling molecule in many pathways. Furthermore, numerous erythrocyte physiological events in the microcirculation are strongly regulated by acetylcholine. Thus, it is time to revise our understanding of the role of vascular acetylcholine in humans. Its biological and pathobiological roles must be evaluated in more detail to eventually achieve novel therapeutical targets. The present article reviews recent findings about nonneuronal acetylcholine in red blood cells, with special regard to (1) red cell rheology, (2) plasma ion concentrations, (3) nitric oxide intracellular translocation and metabolism and (4) band 3 protein phosphorylation.

Indexed as

AcetylcholineAcetylcholinesteraseErythrocytesHumansModels, BiologicalNitric OxideReceptors, MuscarinicAcetylcholineAcetylcholinesteraseNitric OxideReceptors, Muscarinic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.