Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20352114›Full record

ArticlePloS one2010

Within and between whorls: comparative transcriptional profiling of Aquilegia and Arabidopsis.

Claudia Voelckel, Justin O Borevitz, Elena M Kramer, Scott A Hodges

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. A chromosome-scale reference genome ofHorticulture research · 2020
    Article
  5. Evolution of floral diversity: genomics, genes and gamma.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Predictable transcriptome evolution in the convergent and complex bioluminescent organs of squid.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Claudia VoelckelAllan Wilson Centre for Molecular Ecology and Evolution, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand. c.voelckel@massey.ac.nz
Justin O Borevitz
Elena M Kramer
Scott A Hodges

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe genus Aquilegia is an emerging model system in plant evolutionary biology predominantly because of its wide variation in floral traits and associated floral ecology. The anatomy of the Aquilegia flower is also very distinct. There are two whorls of petaloid organs, the outer whorl of sepals and the second whorl of petals that form nectar spurs, as well as a recently evolved fifth whorl of staminodia inserted between stamens and carpels. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe designed an oligonucleotide microarray based on EST sequences from a mixed tissue, normalized cDNA library of an A. formosa x A. pubescens F2 population representing 17,246 unigenes. We then used this array to analyze floral gene expression in late pre-anthesis stage floral organs from a natural A. formosa population. In particular, we tested for gene expression patterns specific to each floral whorl and to combinations of whorls that correspond to traditional and modified ABC model groupings. Similar analyses were performed on gene expression data of Arabidopsis thaliana whorls previously obtained using the Ath1 gene chips (data available through The Arabidopsis Information Resource). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our comparative gene expression analyses suggest that 1) petaloid sepals and petals of A. formosa share gene expression patterns more than either have organ-specific patterns, 2) petals of A. formosa and A. thaliana may be independently derived, 3) staminodia express B and C genes similar to stamens but the staminodium genetic program has also converged on aspects of the carpel program and 4) staminodia have unique up-regulation of regulatory genes and genes that have been implicated with defense against microbial infection and herbivory. Our study also highlights the value of comparative gene expression profiling and the Aquilegia microarray in particular for the study of floral evolution and ecology.

Indexed as

AquilegiaArabidopsisCell CycleDNA, ComplementaryDNA PrimersEvolution, MolecularExpressed Sequence TagsFlowersGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantNucleic Acid HybridizationOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisDNA, ComplementaryDNA Primers

Identifiers

PMID20352114
PMCPMC2843724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.