ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2009
A set of preliminary standards recommended for achieving a national repository of clinical decision support interventions.
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- How Stakeholder Assessment of E-Prescribing Can Help Determine Incentives to Facilitate Management of Care: A Delphi Study.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2017Article
- Cross-vendor evaluation of key user-defined clinical decision support capabilities: a scenario-based assessment of certified electronic health records with guidelines for future development.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015Article
- Creating computable algorithms for symptom management in an outpatient thoracic oncology setting.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2013Article
- Beyond the threshold: real-time use of evidence in practice.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2013Article
- Comparison of clinical knowledge management capabilities of commercially-available and leading internally-developed electronic health records.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2011Article
- Representation of Clinical Nursing Protocols Using GEM II & GEM Cutter.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2010Article
- Standards for scalable clinical decision support: need, current and emerging standards, gaps, and proposal for progress.The open medical informatics journal · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We are investigating the development, implementation and evaluation of clinical decision support (CDS) projects to advance our understanding of how best to incorporate these interventions into the delivery of healthcare. Our overall goal is to explore how the translation of clinical knowledge into CDS and its incorporation into practice can be routinely achieved to improve the quality of healthcare delivered in the U.S.A. Toward this end, we have developed a 7-step model that provides a framework for clinical decision support-related standards that are necessary if we wish to achieve these goals. We believe that if all commercially available EHR systems had the features and functions described in these recommendations, many more healthcare organizations could begin to develop and implement the basic CDS features that are necessary to radically transform the quality, safety, and cost of the current healthcare system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20351928PMC2815391What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.