Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20351926›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2009

Decision making and physician prescribing characteristics: a pilot study of Japanese physicians.

Akiko Shibuya, Masaharu Nakayama, Ryusuke Inoue, Yutaka Imai, Yoshiaki Kondo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Akiko ShibuyaDepartment of Medical Informatics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Masaharu Nakayama
Ryusuke Inoue
Yutaka Imai
Yoshiaki Kondo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The factors that affect physicians' prescribing remain unclear. Although previous reports suggest that prescription decisions are associated with various clinical situation, most of these studies analyzed simulated patient models rather than actual clinical practice. Here, we retrospectively analyzed actual cases of statin prescription for hyperlipidemia at Tohoku University Hospital between Apr 1, 2004 and Mar 31, 2008. Twelve physicians (6 cardiologists, 3 nephrologist, and 3 diabetologist) made decisions on whether to prescribe statins to 187 patients in 788 visits. As expected, cardiologists started prescribing statins at significantly lower serum total cholesterol levels than other specialists (221.7mg/dL vs. 244.7mg/dL, P<0.05). Interestingly, the total cholesterol levels that triggered prescribing differed significantly among cardiologists (p<0.05). These results suggested that prescription decisions differed not only among specialties but also among individuals.

Indexed as

Decision MakingPractice Patterns, Physicians'AgedAsian PeopleCardiologyCholesterolDrug PrescriptionsEndocrinologyFemaleHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsHyperlipidemiasMaleMedical Order Entry SystemsMedical RecordsMiddle AgedCholesterolHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID20351926
PMCPMC2815422

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.