Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20351326›Full record

SynthesisJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2010

Fusion gene-negative alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma is clinically and molecularly indistinguishable from embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma.

Daniel Williamson, Edoardo Missiaglia, Aurélien de Reyniès, Gaëlle Pierron, Benedicte Thuille, Gilles Palenzuela, Khin Thway, Daniel Orbach, Marick Laé, Paul Fréneaux and 4 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 235 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
235citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
28.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

235 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 489 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Gene Amplification in Rhabdomyosarcoma: Lessons from a Rare Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

175 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel WilliamsonINSERM Unité 830, Unité de Génétique Somatique, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Edoardo Missiaglia
Aurélien de Reyniès
Gaëlle Pierron
Benedicte Thuille
Gilles Palenzuela
Khin Thway
Daniel Orbach
Marick Laé
Paul Fréneaux
Kathy Pritchard-Jones
Odile Oberlin
Janet Shipley
Olivier Delattre
Inserm · FR

Funding

Cancer Research UK C5066/A9880
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine whether the clinical and molecular biologic characteristics of the alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (ARMS) and embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (ERMS) subtypes have relevance independent of the presence or absence of the PAX/FOXO1 fusion gene. PATIENTS AND

methodsThe fusion gene status of 210 histopathologically reviewed, clinically annotated rhabdomyosarcoma samples was determined by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess event-free survival and overall survival in fusion gene-negative ARMS (ARMSn; n = 39), fusion gene-positive ARMS (ARMSp; n = 94), and ERMS (n = 77). A total of 101 RMS samples were also profiled for whole-genome expression, and 128 were profiled for genomic copy number imbalances. Profiling data were analyzed by supervised and unsupervised methods to compare features related to histopathology and fusion gene status. Results were also projected by meta-analysis techniques across three separate publically available data sets.

resultsOverall and event-free survival, frequency of metastases, and distribution of site at initial presentation were not significantly different between ARMSn and ERMS. Consistent with this, analysis of gene expression signatures could not reproducibly distinguish ARMSn from ERMS whereas fusion gene-positive cases were distinct. ARMSn and ERMS frequently show whole-chromosome copy number changes, notably gain of chromosome 8 with associated high levels of expression of genes from this chromosome.

conclusionThe clinical behavior and molecular characteristics of alveolar cases without a fusion gene are indistinguishable from embryonal cases and significantly different from fusion-positive alveolar cases. This implies that fusion gene status irrespective of histology is a critical factor in risk stratification of RMS.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, Human, Pair 8Genetic TestingChildChild, PreschoolDiagnosis, DifferentialDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFranceGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleNuclear Receptor Coactivator 1Oncogene Proteins, FusionPaired Box Transcription FactorsNCOA1 protein, humanNuclear Receptor Coactivator 1Oncogene Proteins, FusionPaired Box Transcription FactorsPAX3-FOXO1A fusion protein, humanPAX3 protein, humanPAX3 Transcription FactorPAX7 protein, humanPAX7 Transcription Factor

Identifiers

PMID20351326
OpenAlexW2119501563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.