Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20351298›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2010

A minority of foci or pan-nuclear apoptotic staining of gammaH2AX in the S phase after UV damage contain DNA double-strand breaks.

Sebastien de Feraudy, Ingrid Revet, Vladimir Bezrookove, Luzviminda Feeney, James E Cleaver

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 124 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
124citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

124 citing papers in PubMed, 195 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Science translational medicine · 2023
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Reconstructing EBV reactivation and DNA damage response kinetics in morphologic pseudotime.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

64 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sebastien de FeraudyDepartment of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA. sdeferaudy@partners.org
Ingrid Revet
Vladimir Bezrookove
Luzviminda Feeney
James E Cleaver
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Translational InformaticsP30CA082103 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Jennifer Leigh Clarke · 1999 to 2026
$209.7M
Tissue CoreP01AR050440 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI EPSTEIN, ERVIN HAROLD · 2003 to 2007
$6.9M
DNA Damage and Neurodegeneration in Cockayne SyndromeR01NS052781 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CLEAVER, JAMES E · 2006 to 2009
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA082103NCI NIH HHS P30 CA82103NIAMS NIH HHS P01 AR050440NIAMS NIH HHS P01AR050440NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS052781NINDS NIH HHS R01NS052781
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

UV irradiation induces histone variant H2AX phosphorylated on serine 139 (gammaH2AX) foci and high levels of pan-nuclear gammaH2AX staining without foci, but the significance of this finding is still uncertain. We examined the formation of gammaH2AX and 53BP1 that coincide at sites of double-strand breaks (DSBs) after ionizing radiation. We compared UV irradiation and treatment with etoposide, an agent that causes DSBs during DNA replication. We found that during DNA replication, UV irradiation induced at least three classes of gammaH2AX response: a minority of gammaH2AX foci colocalizing with 53BP1 foci that represent DSBs at replication sites, a majority of gammaH2AX foci that did not colocalize with 53BP1 foci, and cells with high levels of pan-nuclear gammaH2AX without foci of either gammaH2AX or 53BP1. Ataxia-telangiectasia mutated kinase and JNK mediated the UV-induced pan-nuclear gammaH2Ax, which preceded and paralleled UV-induced S phase apoptosis. These high levels of pan-nuclear gammaH2AX were further increased by loss of the bypass polymerase Pol eta and inhibition of ataxia-telangiectasia and Rad3-related, but the levels required the presence of the damage-binding proteins of excision repair xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group A and C proteins. DSBs, therefore, represent a small variable fraction of UV-induced gammaH2AX foci dependent on repair capacity, and they are not detected within high levels of pan-nuclear gammaH2AX, a preapoptotic signal associated with ATM- and JNK-dependent apoptosis during replication. The formation of gammaH2AX foci after treatment with DNA-damaging agents cannot, therefore, be used as a direct measure of DSBs without independent corroborating evidence.

Indexed as

ApoptosisDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedGene Expression RegulationCell LineCell NucleusCell SeparationDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseFlow CytometryHistonesHumansIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsKineticsS PhaseTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1Ultraviolet RaysY-Family DNA PolymerasesDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseH2AX protein, humanHistonesIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsRad30 proteinTP53BP1 protein, humanTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1Y-Family DNA Polymerases

Identifiers

PMID20351298
PMCPMC2872460
OpenAlexW2074329485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.