ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2010
Influence of media and testing methodology on susceptibility to tigecycline of Enterobacteriaceae with reported high tigecycline MIC.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Antibiofilm Properties of Antiseptic Agents Used onInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Evaluating the performance characteristics of different antimicrobial susceptibility testing methodologies for testing susceptibility of gram-negative bacteria to tigecycline.BMC infectious diseases · 2021Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Seven Tigecycline Susceptibility Testing Methods for Carbapenem-ResistantInfection and drug resistance · 2021Article
- Comparative evaluation of tigecycline susceptibility testing methods for expanded-spectrum cephalosporin- and carbapenem-resistant gram-negative pathogens.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2012Article
- Effect of manganese in test media on in vitro susceptibility of Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter baumannii to tigecycline.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The tigecycline susceptibility of six different Enterobacteriaceae strains with reported high tigecycline MICs was determined in quintuplicate by four methodologies using Mueller-Hinton agar and broth from six manufacturers. The MICs determined by Etest were a >or=1-fold dilution lower than those determined by broth microdilution and agar dilution, with the highest modal values given by agar dilution. The highest modal MICs were obtained using Oxoid medium, and the lowest inhibition zone values (disc diffusion) were obtained using Oxoid and bioMérieux media. The lowest MICs were obtained by Etest using Difco or Merck media.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.