Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20351181›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology2010

Comparative analysis of chromatin binding by Sex Comb on Midleg (SCM) and other polycomb group repressors at a Drosophila Hox gene.

Liangjun Wang, Neal Jahren, Ellen L Miller, Carrie S Ketel, Daniel R Mallin, Jeffrey A Simon

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Polycomb Recruiters Inside and Outside of the Repressed Domains.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. SUMOylation in development and neurodegeneration.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Liangjun WangDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.
Neal Jahren
Ellen L Miller
Carrie S Ketel
Daniel R Mallin
Jeffrey A Simon
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

TRANSCRIPTIONAL REPRESSION BY POLYCOMB GROUP PRODUCTSR01GM049850 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI SIMON, JEFFREY A · 1996 to 2017
$4.8M
DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY TRAINING PROGRAMT32HD007480 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI O'CONNOR, MICHAEL BRENDAN · 1995 to 2011
$1.2M
NICHD NIH HHS HD07480NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007480NIGMS NIH HHS GM49850NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM049850
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex Comb on Midleg (SCM) is a transcriptional repressor in the Polycomb group (PcG), but its molecular role in PcG silencing is not known. Although SCM can interact with Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) in vitro, biochemical studies have indicated that SCM is not a core constituent of PRC1 or PRC2. Nevertheless, SCM is just as critical for Drosophila Hox gene silencing as canonical subunits of these well-characterized PcG complexes. To address functional relationships between SCM and other PcG components, we have performed chromatin immunoprecipitation studies using cultured Drosophila Schneider line 2 (S2) cells and larval imaginal discs. We find that SCM associates with a Polycomb response element (PRE) upstream of the Ubx gene which also binds PRC1, PRC2, and the DNA-binding PcG protein Pleiohomeotic (PHO). However, SCM is retained at this Ubx PRE despite genetic disruption or knockdown of PHO, PRC1, or PRC2, suggesting that SCM chromatin targeting does not require prior association of these other PcG components. Chromatin immunoprecipitations (IPs) to test the consequences of SCM genetic disruption or knockdown revealed that PHO association is unaffected, but reduced levels of PRE-bound PRC2 and PRC1 were observed. We discuss these results in light of current models for recruitment of PcG complexes to chromatin targets.

Indexed as

Genes, HomeoboxAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsChromatinDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsFemaleGene SilencingHomeodomain ProteinsHumansMaleMolecular Sequence DataPolycomb-Group ProteinsProtein BindingRepressor ProteinsChromatinDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsHomeodomain Proteinspho protein, DrosophilaPolycomb-Group ProteinsRepressor ProteinsSCM protein, DrosophilaTranscription FactorsUbx protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID20351181
PMCPMC2876513
OpenAlexW2139025888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.