Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20351054›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2010

Adaptive evolution of genes duplicated from the Drosophila pseudoobscura neo-X chromosome.

Richard P Meisel, Benedict B Hilldorfer, Jessica L Koch, Steven Lockton, Stephen W Schaeffer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Population genomics ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Richard P MeiselIntercollege Graduate Program in Genetics, The Pennsylvania State University, PA, USA. meisel@cornell.edu
Benedict B Hilldorfer
Jessica L Koch
Steven Lockton
Stephen W Schaeffer
Pennsylvania State University · USCornell University · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

The evolution of dosage compensation in DrosophilaR01GM076007 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BACHTROG, DORIS · 2006 to 2020
$3.6M
Gene Expression, Duplicated Genes, and Sex Bias in DrosophilaF32GM087611 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI MEISEL, RICHARD P. · 2008 to 2010
$143k
NIGMS NIH HHS 5R01 GM076007NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM087611NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM076007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drosophila X chromosomes are disproportionate sources of duplicated genes, and these duplications are usually the result of retrotransposition of X-linked genes to the autosomes. The excess duplication is thought to be driven by natural selection for two reasons: X chromosomes are inactivated during spermatogenesis, and the derived copies of retroposed duplications tend to be testis expressed. Therefore, autosomal derived copies of retroposed genes provide a mechanism for their X-linked paralogs to "escape" X inactivation. Once these duplications have fixed, they may then be selected for male-specific functions. Throughout the evolution of the Drosophila genus, autosomes have fused with X chromosomes along multiple lineages giving rise to neo-X chromosomes. There has also been excess duplication from the two independent neo-X chromosomes that have been examined--one that occurred prior to the common ancestor of the willistoni species group and another that occurred along the lineage leading to Drosophila pseudoobscura. To determine what role natural selection plays in the evolution of genes duplicated from the D. pseudoobscura neo-X chromosome, we analyzed DNA sequence divergence between paralogs, polymorphism within each copy, and the expression profiles of these duplicated genes. We found that the derived copies of all duplicated genes have elevated nonsynonymous polymorphism, suggesting that they are under relaxed selective constraints. The derived copies also tend to have testis- or male-biased expression profiles regardless of their chromosome of origin. Genes duplicated from the neo-X chromosome appear to be under less constraints than those duplicated from other chromosome arms. We also find more evidence for historical adaptive evolution in genes duplicated from the neo-X chromosome, suggesting that they are under a unique selection regime in which elevated nonsynonymous polymorphism provides a large reservoir of functional variants, some of which are fixed by natural selection.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGene DuplicationAnimalsBase SequenceDrosophilaEvolution, MolecularFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGenes, InsectGenome, InsectMaleMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenySelection, GeneticSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID20351054
PMCPMC2915643
OpenAlexW2120231855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.