Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20350190›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of infectious diseases2010

Effect of vaccination with modified vaccinia Ankara (ACAM3000) on subsequent challenge with Dryvax.

Michael S Seaman, Marissa B Wilck, Lindsey R Baden, Stephen R Walsh, Lauren E Grandpre, Colleen Devoy, Ayush Giri, Lizanne C Noble, Jane A Kleinjan, Kristen E Stevenson and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00133575 (ACAM 3000 MVA), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00133575 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

ACAM 3000 MVA (Acambis Modified Vaccinia Ankara) Immunization Followed by Dryvax® Vaccination of Healthy Vaccinia-Naïve Adults: A Phase I/II, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Effects of Dose and Route of Administration of MVA on Safety, Reactogenicity and Immunogenicity, Followed by Dryvax® Immunization to Assess Effects of MVA Vaccination on Dryvax® Takes

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)Ran2005 to 2008Enrolled72ConditionsSmallpoxArmsMVA Smallpox Vaccine, Placebo, Live vaccinia virus vaccine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Monkeypox: epidemiology, pathogenesis, treatment and prevention.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Subcutaneous vaccine administration - an outmoded practice.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Michael S SeamanDivision of Viral Pathogenesis, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Marissa B Wilck
Lindsey R Baden
Stephen R Walsh
Lauren E Grandpre
Colleen Devoy
Ayush Giri
Lizanne C Noble
Jane A Kleinjan
Kristen E Stevenson
Haesook T Kim
Raphael Dolin

Funding

Treatments for Nipah Virus InfectionU54AI057159 · NIAID · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI KASPER, DENNIS L. · 2003 to 2013
$113.7M
Research Resource Technical Development ComponentU19AI057330 · NIAID · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI REINHERZ, ELLIS L · 2003 to 2009
$19.5M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI057330NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI057159
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the success of smallpox vaccination, the immunological correlates of protection are not fully understood. To investigate this question, we examined the effect of immunization with modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) on subsequent challenge with replication-competent vaccinia virus (Dryvax).

methodsDryvax challenge by scarification was conducted in 36 healthy subjects who had received MVA (n = 29) or placebo (n = 7) in a previous study of doses and routes of immunization. Subjects were followed up for clinical take, viral shedding, and immune responses.

resultsMVA administration attenuated clinical takes in 21 (72%) of 29 subjects, compared with 0 of 7 placebo recipients (P = .001). Attenuation was most significant in MVA groups that received 1 x 10(7) median tissue culture infective doses (TCID(50)) intradermally (P = .001) and 1 x 10(7) TCID(50) intramuscularly (P = .001). Both duration and peak titer of viral shedding were reduced in MVA recipients. Peak neutralizing antibody responses to vaccinia virus or MVA previously induced by MVA immunization were associated with attenuated takes (P = .02) and reduced duration (P = .001) and titer (P = .005) of viral shedding.

conclusionsMVA immunization results in clinical and virologic protection against Dryvax challenge. Protection is associated with prior induction of neutralizing antibodies to MVA or vaccinia virus. MVA administered intradermally has protective and immunologic responses similar to those of a 10-fold-higher dose given subcutaneously.

Indexed as

VaccinationAdultAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralDose-Response Relationship, ImmunologicFemaleHumansInjections, IntradermalInjections, IntramuscularMaleSmallpox VaccineTime FactorsVaccines, AttenuatedVaccinia virusVirus SheddingYoung AdultAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralDryVax vaccineSmallpox VaccineVaccines, Attenuated

Identifiers

PMID20350190
PMCPMC3023456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.