Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20350139›Full record

ReviewPharmacogenomics2010

Use of transcriptomics in understanding mechanisms of drug-induced toxicity.

Yuxia Cui, Richard S Paules

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacogenomics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. GADD45 in Stress Signaling, Cell Cycle Control, and Apoptosis.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. High-Throughput Transcriptomics Platform for Screening Environmental Chemicals.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yuxia CuiEnvironmental Stress & Cancer Group, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Mail Drop D2-03, PO Box 12233, 111 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
Richard S Paules

Funding

Appl Of Microarray Tech To Understanding The Mechanism Of Environmental AgentsZIAES023026 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI PAULES, RICHARD · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA ES023026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are an important clinical issue and a serious public health risk. Understanding the underlying mechanisms is critical for clinical diagnosis and management of different ADRs. Toxicogenomics can reveal impacts on biological pathways and processes that had not previously been considered to be involved in a drug response. Mechanistic hypotheses can be generated that can then be experimentally tested using the full arsenal of pharmacology, toxicology, molecular biology and genetics. Recent transcriptomic studies on drug-induced toxicity, which have provided valuable mechanistic insights into various ADRs, have been reviewed with a focus on nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity. Related issues have been discussed, including extrapolation of mechanistic findings from experimental model systems to humans using blood as a surrogate tissue for organ damage and comparative systems biology approaches.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsGene Expression ProfilingAnimalsChemical and Drug Induced Liver InjuryHumansKidney DiseasesToxicogenetics

Identifiers

PMID20350139
PMCPMC2884389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.