Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20349528›Full record

ReviewTrends in biotechnology2010

Novel opportunities for computational biology and sociology in drug discovery.

Lixia Yao, James A Evans, Andrey Rzhetsky

Open access · bronzeAbstract readCorrected and Republished ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in biotechnology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. A geometric deep learning model for display and prediction of potential drug-virus interactions against SARS-CoV-2.Chemometrics and intelligent laboratory systems : an international journal sponsored by the Chemometrics Society · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lixia YaoDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
James A Evans
Andrey Rzhetsky
University of Chicago · USColumbia University · US

Funding

Nation Center: Multi-Scale Study- Cellular Networks(RMI)U54CA121852 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CALIFANO, ANDREA · 2005 to 2015
$37.4M
Modeling the temporal succession of phenotypes & environnnental cuesP50MH094267 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI RZHETSKY, ANDREY · 2011 to 2015
$10.2M
Computer Systems for Functional Analysis of Genomic DataR01GM061372 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI RZHETSKY, ANDREY · 2001 to 2009
$2.8M
Large-scale Discovery of Scientific Hypotheses; Computation Over Expert OpinionsR01LM010132 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI EVANS, JAMES ALLEN, FOSTER, IAN · 2009 to 2010
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA121852NCI NIH HHS U54 CA121852-01A1NIGMS NIH HHS GM61372NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM061372NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH094267NLM NIH HHS R01 LM010132
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current drug discovery is impossible without sophisticated modeling and computation. In this review we outline previous advances in computational biology and, by tracing the steps involved in pharmaceutical development,explore a range of novel, high-value opportunities for computational innovation in modeling the biological process of disease and the social process of drug discovery.These opportunities include text mining for new drug leads, modeling molecular pathways and predicting the efficacy of drug cocktails, analyzing genetic overlap between diseases and predicting alternative drug use.Computation can also be used to model research teams and innovative regions and to estimate the value of academy-industry links for scientific and human benefit. Attention to these opportunities could promise punctuated advance and will complement the well-established computational work on which drug discovery currently relies.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDrug DiscoveryHumansModels, BiologicalModels, TheoreticalSociology

Identifiers

PMID20349528
PMCPMC3654551
OpenAlexW148928213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.