Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20349276›Full record

ArticleMycopathologia2010

FT-IR spectroscopy for rapid differentiation of Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus parasiticus and characterization of aflatoxigenic isolates collected from agricultural environments.

David Garon, Anne El Kaddoumi, Alexandra Carayon, Caroline Amiel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycopathologia, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David GaronGroupe Régional d'Etudes sur le Cancer, GRECAN-EA 1772, IFR 146 ICORE, Université de Caen Basse-Normandie, Centre François Baclesse, avenue Général Harris, BP 5026, 14076, Caen Cedex 05, France. david.garon@unicaen.fr
Anne El Kaddoumi
Alexandra Carayon
Caroline Amiel
Université de Caen Normandie · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In agricultural areas, Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillus parasiticus are commonly identified in various feedstuffs and bioaerosols originated from feed handling. Some isolates belonging to these fungal species could produce mycotoxins and constitute a risk factor for human and animal health. In this study, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy was used for a rapid detection and characterization of 99 isolates collected from agricultural areas. The results showed a first cluster corresponding to strains previously attributed to the A. fumigatus group according to current taxonomic concepts, and a second cluster divided in 2 groups around reference strains of A. flavus and A. parasiticus species. The toxigenic capacity of isolates was evaluated by high performance liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. In the A. flavus group, only 6 strains of A. parasiticus and 4 strains of A. flavus were able to produce aflatoxins on culture media. FT-IR spectroscopy, respectively, allowed the differentiation of non-toxigenic and toxigenic A. flavus and A. parasiticus isolates at 75 and 100%. Discrimination between toxigenic and non-toxigenic A. fumigatus was not possible because all of the isolates produced at least one mycotoxin.

Indexed as

Environmental MicrobiologyAflatoxinsAgricultureAnimal FeedAnimalsAspergillusChromatography, High Pressure LiquidHumansMass SpectrometryMycologySpectroscopy, Fourier Transform InfraredAflatoxins

Identifiers

PMID20349276
OpenAlexW1981388809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.