Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20349264›Full record

ArticleInvestigational new drugs2011

Phase I trial of oblimersen (Genasense®) and gemcitabine in refractory and advanced malignancies.

Peter S Galatin, Ranjana H Advani, George A Fisher, Brian Francisco, Thomas Julian, Raquel Losa, Marta I Sierra, Branimir I Sikic

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Investigational new drugs, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Peter S GalatinDepartment of Medicine, Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. peter_galatin@sanjosemed.com
Ranjana H Advani
George A Fisher
Brian Francisco
Thomas Julian
Raquel Losa
Marta I Sierra
Branimir I Sikic
Stanford University · USHospital Universitario Central de Asturias · ESGenedata (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

MODULATION OF MULTIDRUG RESISTANCE MECHANISMSR01CA052168 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SIKIC, BRANIMIR I · 1990 to 2002
$813k
NCI NIH HHS R01CA 52168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOverexpression of Bcl-2 is associated with worse prognosis for a number of cancer types. The present study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of oblimersen (antisense Bcl-2) and gemcitabine when administered to patients with refractory malignancies. MATERIALS AND

methodsSixteen patients with advanced solid tumors refractory to standard therapies were treated with escalating doses of oblimersen continuous, 120-h intravenous infusion given every 14 days, with a fixed-dose-rate intravenous infusion of gemcitabine administered on day 5 of each cycle. Serial plasma samples were collected to calculate the pharmacokinetics of oblimersen and gemcitabine, and also to measure the effect of oblimersen on Bcl-2 expression.

results7 women and 9 men, median age 55 years (range 35-74 years), received a 5-day infusion of oblimersen at dose levels of 5 mg/kg/day (n = 4) or 7 mg/kg/day (n = 12). On the 5th day of the infusion, gemcitabine was given at 10 mg/m(2)/h for a total dose of 1,000 mg/m(2) (n = 7; cohorts I and II), 1,200 mg/m(2) (n = 3; cohort III), or 1,500 mg/m(2) (n = 6; cohort IV). Edema was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), necessitating expansion of cohort IV. No subsequent DLTs were noted. Thus, the maximum planned doses were well tolerated, and a formal MTD was not determined. Most hematologic toxicities were grade 1 or 2. There was low-grade fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and myalgias/arthralgias. Oblimersen C(ss) and AUC increased in relation to the dose escalation, but gemcitabine triphosphate levels did not correlate well with dose. There were no objective responses, though 5 patients had stable disease. A >75% reduction in Bcl-2 expression in peripheral blood mononuclear leucocytes was seen more frequently in patients who achieved stable disease than in progressing patients.

conclusionsThe maximal planned dose levels of oblimersen and gemcitabine in combination were well tolerated. Only one DLT (edema) occurred. There was a correlation between Bcl-2 reduction and stable disease. The recommended doses of the drugs for future studies are 7 mg/kg/day of oblimersen on days 1-5, and gemcitabine 1,500 mg/m(2) on day 5, every two weeks.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmAdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsCohort StudiesDeoxycytidineDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleGemcitabineGenes, bcl-2HumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingOligonucleotides, AntisenseAntineoplastic AgentsDeoxycytidineGemcitabineoblimersenOligonucleotides, AntisenseThionucleotides

Identifiers

PMID20349264
OpenAlexW2030311599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.