ArticleOecologia2010
Amino acid abundance and proteolytic potential in North American soils.
Article in Oecologia, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nitrogen sources differentially affect respiration, growth, and carbon allocation in Andean and Lowland ecotypes ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- High Genetic Potential for Proteolytic Decomposition in Northern Peatland Ecosystems.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2019Article
- Soil microbial responses to nitrogen addition in arid ecosystems.Frontiers in microbiology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Studies of nitrogen (N) cycling have traditionally focused on N mineralization as the primary process limiting plant assimilation of N. Recent evidence has shown that plants may assimilate amino acids (AAs) directly, circumventing the mineralization pathway. However, the general abundance of soil AAs and their relative importance in plant N uptake remains unclear in most ecosystems. We compared the concentrations and potential production rates of AAs and NH(4) (+), as well as the edaphic factors that influence AA dynamics, in 84 soils across the United States. Across all sites, NH(4) (+) and AA-N comprised similar proportions of the total bioavailable N pool (approximately 20%), with NO(3) (-) being the dominant form of extractable N everywhere but in tundra and boreal forest soils. Potential rates of AA production were at least comparable to those of NH(4) (+) production in all ecosystems, particularly in semi-arid grasslands, where AA production rates were six times greater than for NH(4) (+) (P < 0.01). Potential rates of proteolytic enzyme activity were greatest in bacteria-dominated soils with low NH(4) (+) concentrations, including many grassland soils. Based on research performed under standardized laboratory conditions, our continental-scale analyses suggest that soil AA and NH(4) (+) concentrations are similar in most soils and that AAs may contribute to plant and microbial N demand in most ecosystems, particularly in ecosystems with N-poor soils.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20349250What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.