Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20347056›Full record

ArticleBone2010

Rate of bone loss is greater in young Mexican American men than women: the San Antonio Family Osteoporosis Study.

John R Shaffer, Candace M Kammerer, Amy S Dressen, Jan M Bruder, Richard L Bauer, Braxton D Mitchell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Age- and sex-related changes in proximal humeral volumetric BMD assessed via chest CT with a deep learning-based segmentation model.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  3. Clinical impact of recent genetic discoveries in osteoporosis.The application of clinical genetics · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

John R ShafferDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA. jrs51@pitt.edu
Candace M Kammerer
Amy S Dressen
Jan M Bruder
Richard L Bauer
Braxton D Mitchell
University of Pittsburgh · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Research BaseP30DK072488 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI MITCHELL, BRAXTON D, TAYLOR, SIMEON I. · 2005 to 2019
$17.3M
GENETICS OF BONE DENSITY IN MEXICAN AMERICANSR01AR043351 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI MITCHELL, BRAXTON D · 1997 to 2008
$2.5M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR043351NIAMS NIH HHS R01-AR-43351NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK072488
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about the progression of bone loss during young adulthood and whether it differs between men and women. As part of the San Antonio Family Osteoporosis Study we tested whether bone mineral density (BMD) changed over time in men or women, and whether the rate of BMD change differed between the sexes. BMD of the proximal femur, spine, radius, and whole body was measured in 115 men and 202 pre-menopausal women (ages 25 to 45 years; Mexican American ancestry) by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at two time points (5.6 years apart), from which annual percent change-in-BMD was calculated. Likelihood-based methods were used to test whether change-in-BMD differs from zero or differs between men and women. In men, percent change-in-BMD was significantly greater than zero for the 1/3 radius (i.e. indicating a gain of BMD; Bonferroni-adjusted p<0.01), less than zero for the femoral neck, lumbar spine, ultradistal radius, and whole body (i.e. indicating a loss of BMD; p<0.01 for all), and not different than zero for the total hip (p=0.24). In women, percent change-in-BMD was greater than zero for the total hip, 1/3 radius, and whole body (p<0.01 for all), less than zero for the ultradistal radius (p<0.01), and not significantly different than zero for the femoral neck and lumbar spine (p=1.0 for both). For all skeletal sites, men experienced greater decrease in BMD (or less increase in BMD) than women; this result was observed both with and without adjustment for age, BMI, and change-in-BMI (p<0.05 for all). These results suggest that significant bone loss occurs at some skeletal sites in young men and women, and that loss of BMD is occurring significantly faster, or gain of BMD is occurring significantly slower, in young men compared to young women.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsAdultBone DensityBone ResorptionFamilyFemaleHumansMaleMexican AmericansMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalOsteoporosisTexasTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID20347056
PMCPMC2891113
OpenAlexW1992137048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.