Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20345515›Full record

ReviewVox sanguinis2010

Use of mouse models to study the mechanisms and consequences of RBC clearance.

E A Hod, S A Arinsburg, R O Francis, J E Hendrickson, J C Zimring, S L Spitalnik

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vox sanguinis, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Analysis of Erythrocyte Membrane Alloantigens.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  4. Flow Cytometric Examination of Galectin Binding to Red Blood Cells.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The Immunology of Transfusion Medicine: Past, Present, and Future.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

E A HodDepartment of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, College of Physicians & Surgeons of Columbia University, 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA.
S A Arinsburg
R O Francis
J E Hendrickson
J C Zimring
S L Spitalnik
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USEmory University · USNew York Blood Center · US

Funding

Regulation of RBC Alloimmunization by Different Types of Recipient InflammationK08HL092959 · NHLBI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI HENDRICKSON, JEANNE E · 2009 to 2012
$514k
NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL092959
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mice provide tractable animal models for studying the pathophysiology of various human disorders. This review discusses the use of mouse models for understanding red-blood-cell (RBC) clearance. These models provide important insights into the pathophysiology of various clinically relevant entities, such as autoimmune haemolytic anaemia, haemolytic transfusion reactions, other complications of RBC transfusions and immunomodulation by Rh immune globulin therapy. Mouse models of both antibody- and non-antibody-mediated RBC clearance are reviewed. Approaches for exploring unanswered questions in transfusion medicine using these models are also discussed.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnemia, Hemolytic, AutoimmuneAnimalsErythrocytesErythrocyte TransfusionHumansMice

Identifiers

PMID20345515
PMCPMC3580149
OpenAlexW1529252891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.