Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20340004›Full record

ArticleMedical molecular morphology2010

Difference in abundance of blood and lymphatic capillaries in the murine epididymis.

Shuichi Hirai, Munekazu Naito, Hayato Terayama, Qu Ning, Masahiro Miura, Gotaro Shirakami, Masahiro Itoh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical molecular morphology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shuichi HiraiDepartment of Anatomy, Tokyo Medical University, 6-1-1 Shinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8402, Japan. anatomy@tokyo-med.ac.jp
Munekazu Naito
Hayato Terayama
Qu Ning
Masahiro Miura
Gotaro Shirakami
Masahiro Itoh

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well known that the epididymis is responsible for the transportation, storage, and maturation of spermatozoa, and that it has four segments: i.e., initial segment, caput, corpus, and cauda. Previous studies revealed the presence of a very dense network of blood capillaries only in the initial segment; however, the relative distribution of blood and lymphatic capillaries has remained unknown. In the present study, we investigated the distribution of intraepididymal blood and lymphatic capillaries in mice by use of monoclonal antibodies against CD31 and lymph vessel endothelium HA-receptor 1, respectively. The results showed that lymphatic networks were quite scarce in the initial segment and strikingly abundant in the cauda compared with the other two regions. In sharp contrast, blood capillaries were abundant in both the initial segment and cauda but sparse in the other two regions. This observation suggests that the characteristic distribution of blood and lymphatic capillaries in the epididymis contributes to the different roles of each epididymal region.

Indexed as

AnimalsCapillariesEpididymisGlycoproteinsImmunohistochemistryLymphatic VesselsMaleMembrane Transport ProteinsMiceMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionPlatelet Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecule-1GlycoproteinsLYVE1 protein, mouseMembrane Transport ProteinsPlatelet Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecule-1

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.