ArticleHeart and vessels2010
Elective coronary stent patients: preinterventional functional status and clinical-instrumental assessment.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Behavior, nutrition and lifestyle in a comprehensive health and disease paradigm: skills and knowledge for a predictive, preventive and personalized medicine.The EPMA journal · 2012Article
- Effects of stent implantation for peripheral pulmonary artery stenosis on pulmonary vascular hemodynamics and right ventricular function in a patient with repaired tetralogy of Fallot.Heart and vessels · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The functional status of ischemic heart disease (IHD) is currently assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), a tool for monitoring and predicting the patient's prognosis. Illness perceptions (IP) are associated with IHD behavioral risk factors. The aim of the study was to find whether different IP, as evaluated by the IP Questionnaire (IPQr), can predict any of the features of the SAQ, i.e., to determine whether the SAQ is influenced and/or biased by illness perceptions. Moreover, whether New York Heart Association class and Ejection Fraction (EF%) are predictors of IHD severity measured as need of subsequent stenting procedures was also assessed. Eighty IHD patients eligible for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and drug-eluting stent implant were asked to complete the IPQr and the SAQ. Laboratory analyses, echocardiography, and coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures were performed concurrently. Physical limitations of the SAQ are predicted by IPQr emotional representation. Ischemic heart disease functional status is regulated by illness perceptions and beliefs. Thus, some of the inferences drawn from the SAQ regarding IHD prognosis and even interventional indications may be biased and compromise the prognostic reliability of the SAQ information on physical function. This can also have consequences for therapeutic indications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.