ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2010
Skin bacteria after chlorhexidine exposure-is there a difference in response to human beta-Defensin-3?
Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- EGCG induces β-defensin 3 against influenza A virus H1N1 by the MAPK signaling pathway.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigated whether exposure to sub-lethal concentrations of chlorhexidine digluconate (CHG) changed the response of five Staphylococcus spp. to human beta-Defensin-3 (hBD-3). The change in response for each strain was determined in vitro with time-kill experiments in suspension by comparing the mean log(10) reduction caused by hBD-3 at 1.5 and 3 h in exposed and non-exposed bacteria. The identity of staphylococcal species was verified by DNA sequence homology in the gyrA genes in comparison with reference strains. Baseline sub-lethal concentrations allowing visible bacterial growth were between 0.0625 and 0.25 microg/ml. Sub-lethal CHG concentrations increased within 3 days in two isolates. For S. capitis 19/2, CHG-exposed cells were less susceptible to 0.5 microg/ml hBD-3 (log(10) reduction 0.78 versus 2.06 at 1.5 h; p < 0.001; t-test). For S. aureus, however, CHG-exposed cells were more susceptible to 1 microg/ml hBD-3. The observed changes between CHG-exposed and non-exposed cells did not indicate a general trend in response to hBD-3. Overall, we found no consistent evidence that 3 days of exposure to CHG changed the response of five Staphylococcus spp. to hBD-3. The use of CHG for skin antisepsis is, based on our data, unlikely to change the natural defence activity of hBD-3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.