ArticleAmerican journal of hypertension2010
The impact of differences in methodology and population characteristics on the prevalence of hypertension in US adults in 1976-1980 and 1999-2002.
Article in American journal of hypertension, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Do Depressive Symptoms Predict Blood Pressure Control in US Veterans?Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- Discordance in national estimates of hypertension among young adults.Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundResults from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) indicate that hypertension prevalence declined by 9% points from 34% in 1976-1980 to 25% in 1999-2002 in adults 20-74 years. The purpose of this study was to estimate the impact on hypertension prevalence of measurement error and selected risk factors.
methodsUsing cross-sectional survey data from NHANES, we estimated the effect on hypertension of incorrect blood pressure (BP) cuff size and zero end-digit preference and the effect of changes in the distribution of age, body mass index (BMI), sex, race-ethnicity, smoking, and education. The analytic sample of persons 20-74 years consisted of 11,563 from 1976-1980 and 7,901 from 1999-2002 NHANES. Covariate-adjusted prevalences were calculated using log-linear regression models to produce predictive margins.
resultsAfter adjustment to age, BMI, sex, race-ethnicity, smoking, and education, the prevalence difference became higher, changing from -9% (95% confidence interval (CI): -11, -6) to -14% (95 CI: -17, -11). After adjustment to these risk factors and correction for measurement error the prevalence difference was -9% (95 CI: -11, -6).
conclusionsMeasurement error, mainly from cuff size differences, inflated the temporal decline in hypertension prevalence. The results indicate that age, sex, race-ethnicity, smoking, or education did not fully explain the lower prevalence of measured hypertension in all BMI groups and suggest that a change in some unmeasured factor or factors contributed to the decline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.