ArticleHuman heredity2010
Accounting for disease model uncertainty in mapping heterogeneous traits--a Bayesian model averaging approach.
Article in Human heredity, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLocus heterogeneity, wherein a disease can be caused in different individuals by different genes and/or environmental factors, is a ubiquitous feature of complex traits. A Bayesian approach has been proposed to account for variable rates of heterogeneity across families in a parametric linkage analysis setup [Biswas and Lin: J Am Stat Assoc 2006;101:1341-1351]. As with any parametric approach, its application requires specification of the disease model, which limits its practical utility.
methodsWe address this limitation by proposing a Bayesian model averaging (BMA) approach. We consider a finite number of disease models and treat the model as an unknown parameter. In practice, we use simple single-locus disease models as various categories for model.
resultsOur simulations as well as analysis of Genetic Analysis Workshop 13 simulated data show that BMA retains at least 80% of the power that is obtained by analyzing under the true disease model. The coverage probability of interval for disease gene is maintained around the nominal level. Finally, we apply BMA to a Late-Onset Alzheimer's Disease dataset and find evidence for linkage on chromosomes 19, 9, and 21.
conclusionWe conclude that the BMA approach utilizing simple single-locus models for averaging is effective for mapping heterogeneous traits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.