Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20338851›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2010

Free-solution, label-free protein-protein interactions characterized by dynamic light scattering.

Amy D Hanlon, Michael I Larkin, Ryan M Reddick

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. In Situ Online Spectroscopy and Light Scattering Techniques.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Label-free methods for opticalPhysical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2021
    Review
  12. Competing stress-dependent oligomerization pathways regulate self-assembly of the periplasmic protease-chaperone DegP.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Quantifying Protein-Protein Interactions by Molecular Counting with Mass Photometry.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Quantifying Biomolecular Binding Constants using Video Paper Analytical Devices.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amy D HanlonDepartment of Research and Development, Wyatt Technology, Santa Barbara, California, USA. ahanlon@wyatt.com
Michael I Larkin
Ryan M Reddick
Wyatt Technology (China) · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report a free-solution, label-free method for quantitative characterization of macromolecular interactions using dynamic light scattering, a temperature controlled plate reader, and a multiwell concentration gradient. This nondestructive technique enabled determination of stoichiometry of binding, equilibrium dissociation constant, and thermodynamic parameters, as well as the impact of temperature, buffer salinity, and a small-molecule inhibitor. The low volume capability of dynamic light scattering reduced the required sample to 426 pmol/experiment, with detection limits for 150-kDa proteins anticipated to be in the low femtomole range.

Indexed as

LightScattering, RadiationAlgorithmsAnimalsCattleChymotrypsinDimerizationHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationPancreasSaltsSoybean ProteinsTemperatureTrypsin Inhibitorsalpha-chymotrypsinChymotrypsinSaltsSoybean ProteinsTrypsin Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID20338851
PMCPMC2808485
OpenAlexW2135796100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.