Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20336503›Full record

ArticleFolia microbiologica2010

Spore-forming bacteria in soil cultivated with GM white poplars: isolation and characterization.

M Bonadei, C Calvio, D Carbonera, A Galizzi, E Quattrini, A Balestrazzi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Folia microbiologica, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 92% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M BonadeiDepartment of Genetics and Microbiology, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
C Calvio
D Carbonera
A Galizzi
E Quattrini
A Balestrazzi
University of Pavia · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of transgenic white poplars (Populus alba L. cv. 'Villafranca') was assessed on the soil aerobic spore-forming bacteria (SFB). The genetically modified poplars, expressing either the StSy gene for resveratrol production or the bar gene for herbicide tolerance, were cultivated in greenhouse. The occurrence of SFB was monitored in soil samples collected at eight different timepoints over a two-year period. The total culturable bacterial population of the StSy and bar trials underwent significant seasonal fluctuations in the range of 10(6)-2.5 x 10(8) CFU/g dry soil and of 10(4)-5 x 10(8) CFU/g dry soil, respectively. Changes occurred also within the culturable SFB population with size varying at 10(3)-5 x 10(4) CFU/g dry soil and 10(2)-2 x 10(5) CFU/g dry soil in the StSy and bar trials, respectively. No significant differences in the size of the total and SFB culturable populations were observed when comparing each transgenic line with the nontransformed control line while seasonal shifts of soil bacterial populations were evident in both trials. The culturable SFB fraction included three isolates (SFB-1, SFB-2 and SFB-3) classified by 16S rDNA sequence analysis as members of the Bacillus genus. According to the reported data, cultivation of both herbicide-resistant and resveratrol-producing GM white poplars did not affect the culturable SFB population at the soil level.

Indexed as

Soil MicrobiologyAerobiosisCluster AnalysisColony Count, MicrobialDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalEndospore-Forming BacteriaMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyPlants, Genetically ModifiedPopulusRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSeasonsSequence Analysis, DNADNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID20336503
OpenAlexW1998631026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.