ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2010
A two-phase procedure for QTL mapping with regression models.
Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhancing survival risk prediction through imputation and feature selection in high-dimensional protein biomarker data.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Epistasis analysis for quantitative traits by functional regression model.Genome research · 2014Article
- Overview of LASSO-related penalized regression methods for quantitative trait mapping and genomic selection.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is typical in QTL mapping experiments that the number of markers under investigation is large. This poses a challenge to commonly used regression models since the number of feature variables is usually much larger than the sample size, especially, when epistasis effects are to be considered. The greedy nature of the conventional stepwise procedures is well known and is even more conspicuous in such cases. In this article, we propose a two-phase procedure based on penalized likelihood techniques and extended Bayes information criterion (EBIC) for QTL mapping. The procedure consists of a screening phase and a selection phase. In the screening phase, the main and interaction features are alternatively screened by a penalized likelihood mechanism. In the selection phase, a low-dimensional approach using EBIC is applied to the features retained in the screening phase to identify QTL. The two-phase procedure has the asymptotic property that its positive detection rate (PDR) and false discovery rate (FDR) converge to 1 and 0, respectively, as sample size goes to infinity. The two-phase procedure is compared with both traditional and recently developed approaches by simulation studies. A real data analysis is presented to demonstrate the application of the two-phase procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.