Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20336415›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2010

Rationale and methods for assessment of pain-depressed behavior in preclinical assays of pain and analgesia.

S Stevens Negus, Edward J Bilsky, Gail Pereira Do Carmo, Glenn W Stevenson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Descending control of nociception in insects?Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Antinociceptive Effects of Kappa-Opioid Receptor Agonists.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Acute Negative Allosteric Modulation of MACS chemical neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S Stevens NegusDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA. ssnegus@vcu.edu
Edward J Bilsky
Gail Pereira Do Carmo
Glenn W Stevenson

Funding

Neurobiology and Treatment of PainR01NS070715 · NINDS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI NEGUS, SIDNEY S, SELLEY, DANA E · 2009 to 2018
$3.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS070715
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pain-depressed behavior can be defined as any behavior that decreases in rate, frequency, duration, or intensity in response to a putative pain state. Common examples include pain-related decreases in feeding, locomotion and expression of positively reinforced operant behavior. In humans, depression of behavior is often accompanied by a comorbid depression of mood. Measurements of pain-depressed behaviors are used to diagnose pain in both human and veterinary medicine, and restoration of pain-depressed behavior is often a priority of treatment. This article describes two strategies for integrating measures of pain-depressed behaviors into preclinical assays of pain and analgesia. Assays of pain-depressed behaviors may contribute both to improved translational efficiency in analgesic drug development and to new insights regarding the mechanisms and determinants of pain and analgesia.

Indexed as

Pain MeasurementAcetic AcidAnalgesiaAnalgesicsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHaloperidolHumansMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMorphineNarcotic AntagonistsPainRatsAcetic AcidAnalgesicsHaloperidolMorphineNarcotic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID20336415
PMCPMC5788447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.